Pavlović, Jovica

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
044e2ec6-ca30-4e4f-919a-bbd98fa4dbad
  • Pavlović, Jovica (1)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

Communicating power and resistance in democratic decline: the 2015 smear campaign against Serbia’s ombudsman

Vladisavljević, Nebojša; Krstić, Aleksandra; Pavlović, Jovica

(Palgrave Macmillan : Basingstoke and New York, 2019)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vladisavljević, Nebojša
AU  - Krstić, Aleksandra
AU  - Pavlović, Jovica
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/943
AB  - The chapter explores diverging implications of global democratic decline for public communication in new and old democracies. It draws on empirical evidence from a government-sponsored smear campaign against Serbia’s ombudsman between January and May 2015, including data from quantitative and qualitative analyses of print and electronic media and of Twitter content and from semi-structured interviews with key political, civil society and media actors. The analyses of the main arenas of conflict showed the prevalence of emotions and personal beliefs, as opposed to evidence, in public debates, just like in old democracies. It also revealed, however, a much broader repertoire of strategic deception and authoritarian manipulation, which resulted in sharp polarization in public discourse, systematic violations of press freedom and political competition, and a sharply declining quality of journalism.
PB  - Palgrave Macmillan : Basingstoke and New York
T2  - Media, communication and the struggle for democratic change: Case studies on contested transitions
T1  - Communicating power and resistance in democratic decline: the 2015 smear campaign against Serbia’s ombudsman
EP  - 228
SP  - 205
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_9
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Vladisavljević, Nebojša and Krstić, Aleksandra and Pavlović, Jovica",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The chapter explores diverging implications of global democratic decline for public communication in new and old democracies. It draws on empirical evidence from a government-sponsored smear campaign against Serbia’s ombudsman between January and May 2015, including data from quantitative and qualitative analyses of print and electronic media and of Twitter content and from semi-structured interviews with key political, civil society and media actors. The analyses of the main arenas of conflict showed the prevalence of emotions and personal beliefs, as opposed to evidence, in public debates, just like in old democracies. It also revealed, however, a much broader repertoire of strategic deception and authoritarian manipulation, which resulted in sharp polarization in public discourse, systematic violations of press freedom and political competition, and a sharply declining quality of journalism.",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan : Basingstoke and New York",
journal = "Media, communication and the struggle for democratic change: Case studies on contested transitions",
booktitle = "Communicating power and resistance in democratic decline: the 2015 smear campaign against Serbia’s ombudsman",
pages = "228-205",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_9"
}
Vladisavljević, N., Krstić, A.,& Pavlović, J.. (2019). Communicating power and resistance in democratic decline: the 2015 smear campaign against Serbia’s ombudsman. in Media, communication and the struggle for democratic change: Case studies on contested transitions
Palgrave Macmillan : Basingstoke and New York., 205-228.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_9
Vladisavljević N, Krstić A, Pavlović J. Communicating power and resistance in democratic decline: the 2015 smear campaign against Serbia’s ombudsman. in Media, communication and the struggle for democratic change: Case studies on contested transitions. 2019;:205-228.
doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_9 .
Vladisavljević, Nebojša, Krstić, Aleksandra, Pavlović, Jovica, "Communicating power and resistance in democratic decline: the 2015 smear campaign against Serbia’s ombudsman" in Media, communication and the struggle for democratic change: Case studies on contested transitions (2019):205-228,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16748-6_9 . .
3
3