@article{
author = "Danković-Stepanović, Sanja",
year = "2014",
abstract = "The subject of this paper is the analysis of the legal relationship of business concentration, dominant market position and its abuse, which indicates a violation of effective competition. Special attention is dedicated to the institute of conditional concentration, especially when giving permission for its implementation after the acceptance of the proposal of special conditions and measures that participants in the transaction are willing to undertake, and when Commission for Protection of Competition considers them as appropriate for the prevention of the risk of distortion of competition caused by the implemented concentration. The concentration of economic entities in a particular market is not prohibited - on the contrary, the assumption of the prevalence of positive business, compared to negative business effects is positive, in the field of distortion of market balance. Furthermore, the creation of a dominant position via concentration is not inadmissible, even in the case when its sole objective is the abuse of the market power that is the restriction of effective competition. Concentration will enter into the field of the legal regime of prohibition only if the abuse of a dominant position is committed by it. Therefore, unlike the restrictive agreement, as another form of violation of competition, which is familiar with the subjective-objective concept of prohibition, in the sense that the agreement is null and void if it, as a purpose or effect, has a significant distortion of competition - in the case of the abuse of a dominant position, the legal model of objective or effective or consequential prohibition is in force. The conclusion of this paper implies that there is a substantial and functional legal connection between the conditional approval of the concentration and the dominant position in the market, in the sense that the institution of conditional concentration also represents a matter of preventive supervision over business activities of market participant who has a dominant position - consequently making it possible to prevent its abuse, which would indicate a violation of effective competition. On the other hand, research results indicate the great importance, in terms of preventive and rational action, of the legal model which interrupts the examination of infringement procedure due to the acceptance of the proposal of obligation on the side of parties in order to eliminate possible violations of competition, with the conclusion that there is a significantly broader scope of application in cases of abuse of a dominant position in relation to restrictive, and especially horizontal agreements - representing, since 2013 when it was introduced in the domestic legislative environment, the current most important institute in the area of domestic competition law reform., Ovaj rad ima za predmet analizu pravnog odnosa poslovne koncentracije, dominantnog tržišnog položaja i njegove zloupotrebe, koja označava povredu efektivne konkurencije. Posebna pažnja povećena je institutu uslovne koncentracije, kada se daje saglasnost za njeno sprovođenje nakon što je prihvaćen predlog posebnih uslova i mera koje su učesnici transakcije spremni da preduzmu, a Komisija za zaštitu konkurencije ih smatra adekvatnim za predupređenje opasnosti narušavanja konkurencije usled sprovedene koncentracije. Koncentracija privrednih subjekata na određenom tržištu nije zabranjena - naprotiv, pozitivna je pretpostavka prevalentnosti pozitivnih poslovnih, u odnosu na negativne efekte u domenu narušavanja tržišnog balansa. Nije nedopušteno ni stvaranje dominantnog položaja koncentracijom, čak i u situaciji kada je njen isključivi cilj bila zloupotreba tržišne moći, odnosno ograničavanje efektivne konkurencije. Koncentracija će ući na teren pravnog režima zabrane samo ukoliko se njom objektivno izvrši zloupotreba dominantnog položaja. Dakle, za razliku od restriktivnih sporazuma kao drugog oblika povrede konkurencije, koji poznaju subjektivno-objektivni koncept zabrane, u smislu da je ništav dogovor koji za cilj ili posledicu ima značajno narušavanje konkurencije - kod zloupotrebe dominantnog položaja na snazi je pravni model objektivne, odnosno efektivne, odnosno posledične zabrane. Zaključak rada je da postoji supstancijalna i funkcionalna pravna veza između uslovnog odobrenja koncentracije i dominantnog položaja na tržištu, u smislu da se institut uslovne koncentracije istovremeno javlja i kao način preventivnog nadzora nad poslovanjem tržišnog učesnika koji ima dominantnu poziciju - konsekventno omogućavajući da se predupredi njena zloupotreba koja bi značila povredu efektivne konkurencije. Rezultat istraživanja ukazuje, sa druge strane, na veliki značaj koji u smislu preventivnog delovanja, ali i racionalnog postupanja, ima pravni model prekida postupka ispitivanja povrede konkurencije usled prihvatanja predloga obaveza stranke radi otklanjanja mogućih povreda konkurencije, uz zaključak da postoji značajno širi domen primene u slučajevima zloupotrebe dominantnog položaja u odnosu na restriktivne, a posebno horizontalne sporazume - predstavljajući, od 2013 godine kada je uveden u domaći legislativni ambijent, aktuelno najznačajniji institut u domenu reforme domaćeg prava konkurencije.",
publisher = "Udruženje pravnika u privredi Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Pravo i privreda",
title = "Reform of the notion of the abuse of dominant market position by market participant, Reforma koncepta (zloupotrebe) dominantnog položaja tržišnog učesnika",
pages = "522-506",
number = "4-6",
volume = "52",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_439"
}
