@inbook{
author = "Cvetić, Andrej and Kovačević, Marko",
year = "2021",
abstract = "U ovom radu obrazložićemo stav da je teorija regionalnog
bezbednosnog kompleksa (TRBK) (Buzan and Waever 2003), najadekvatnije
pozicionirana među različitim „regionalističkim“ pristupima u
međunarodnim odnosima, bilo u pogledu izgradnje teorije bilo u
empirijskim istraživanjima o regionalnoj bezbednosti. Ciljevi ovog rada su
trostruki: a) da predstavi TRBK u savremenom proučavanju regionalne
bezbednosti; b) da mapira studije regionalne bezbednosti i sagleda odnos
TRBK sa drugim (srodnim/rivalskim) teorijama; c) da oceni karakter
sagledanog odnosa TRBK i drugih teorija regionalne bezbednosti. Tako
postavljenim ciljevima odgovaraju tri metodološka koraka. Prvo, pregledom
literature želimo ukazati na teorijsku evoluciju i empirijsku primenu TRBK
tokom prethodne dve decenije. Drugo, ponudićemo pregled i klasifikaciju
relevantnih koncepata drugih „regionalističkih“ teorija za koje smatramo da
„rezonuju“ sa okvirom TRBK. Treće, odgovorićemo na pitanje da li je i u
kojoj meri je TRBK kompatibilna sa konceptima užih, rivalskih pristupa.
Smatramo da TRBK može poslužiti kao svojevrstan „interfejs“ širih studija regionalne bezbednosti. Kako bismo ilustrovali predloženi postupak, u
trećem odeljku rada se raspravlja o prednostima koje TRBK kao teorija
srednjeg obima ima u odnosu na rivalske pristupe koji se usredsređuju na
regionalne poretke (Katzenstein 2005; Frazier and Stewart-Ingersoll 2010),
regionalne bezbednosne zajednice (Adler and Barnett 1998), ili regionalni
„multipleks“ međunarodni poredak (Acharya 2014; Acharya 2018).
Zaključak upućuje na mogućnosti hibridizacije TRBK i srodnih/rivalskih
teorijskih pristupa, što otvara značajna pitanja za dalji razvoj istraživačkog
programa studija regionalne bezbednosti u trećoj deceniji XXI veka., In this paper, we argue that the Regional Security Complex
Theory (RSCT) (Buzan and Waever 2003) is most adequately positioned
among various “regionalist” approaches in International Relations, both
for theory-building and empirical research on regional security. The aims
of the paper are threefold: a) to review the RSCT within contemporary
International Security Studies; b) to map out regional security studies and
reflect on the relationship between the RSCT and other (related/rival)
theories; c) to assess the character of the relationship between the RSCT
and other theories. The aforesaid aims are achieved in three steps. First,
by doing a literature review, we want to point out the theoretical
evolution and empirical application of the RSCT over the past two
decades. Second, we offer a review and classification of relevant concepts
from other “regionalist” theories which we consider to “resonate” with
the RSCT framework. Third, we answer the question of whether and to
what degree the RSCT is compatible with the concepts of the narrower,
rival approaches. We argue the RSCT can be used as a sort of “interface”
of wider regional security studies. In order to illustrate our research
framework, the third part of the paper deals with and discusses the
advantages that the RSCT, as a medium-range theory, has in comparison
with the rival approaches that are concerned with regional orders
(Katzenstein 2005; Frazier and Stewart-Ingersoll 2010), regional security
communities (Adler and Barnett 1998), or regional “multiplex” order
(Acharya 2014; Acharya 2018). In conclusion, the paper addresses the
possibilities for hybridization between the RSCT and related/rival
approaches, which have opened some important questions for further
development of the research programme of regional security studies in
the 2020s",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu",
journal = "Regionalna bezbednost : pristupi, elementi, dinamika",
booktitle = "Stanje i dometi teorije regionalnog bezbednosnog kompleksa u proučavanju regiona u međunarodnim odnosima, Reviewing the condition and reach of the regional security complex theory in the study of regions in international relations",
doi = "10.18485/iipe_regbezb.2021.ch1"
}
