Analysis of the EU Measures Adopted in Response to Migrant Crisis: Principle of Institutional Balance and Typology of Legal Acts in the EU Revisited
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This article analyses measures that European Union adopted in response
to migrant crisis, with a special emphasis on Decision 2015/1601 establishing
provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of
Italy and Greece. As Slovakia and Hungary filed actions for annulment of this
Decision before Court of Justice of the European Union, their claims are taken
as a starting point for the analysis. Therefore, this Decision is analyzed in the
framework of the principle of institutional balance and the typology of legal
acts in the EU. After the presentation of principle of institutional balance, re-
search is focused on relation between the Council and European Council and
European Parliament in the process of adoption of this Decision. It is concluded
that the sole possible encroach upon the principle of institutional balance can
be found in the Council’s neglection to reconsult the EP after the change in the
initial content of the Decision (deletion o...f Hungary). As for the typology of
acts in the EU, having in mind the process of evolution of the division between
legislative and non-legislative acts, it is concluded that the main criteria for the
differentiation between these two acts is the procedure in which the act is adopted and not its content, as Slovakia and Hungary claim.
Keywords:
Decision 2015/1601 / principle of institutional balance / Council / European Parliament / typology of acts / Court of Justice of the European UnionSource:
Serbian Political Thought, 2016, 14, 2, 121-139Publisher:
- Beograd : Institut za političke studije
Funding / projects:
- Politički identitet Srbije u regionalnom i globalnom kontekstu
Collections
Institution/Community
FPNTY - JOUR AU - Simentić Popović, Janja PY - 2016 UR - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1109 AB - This article analyses measures that European Union adopted in response to migrant crisis, with a special emphasis on Decision 2015/1601 establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece. As Slovakia and Hungary filed actions for annulment of this Decision before Court of Justice of the European Union, their claims are taken as a starting point for the analysis. Therefore, this Decision is analyzed in the framework of the principle of institutional balance and the typology of legal acts in the EU. After the presentation of principle of institutional balance, re- search is focused on relation between the Council and European Council and European Parliament in the process of adoption of this Decision. It is concluded that the sole possible encroach upon the principle of institutional balance can be found in the Council’s neglection to reconsult the EP after the change in the initial content of the Decision (deletion of Hungary). As for the typology of acts in the EU, having in mind the process of evolution of the division between legislative and non-legislative acts, it is concluded that the main criteria for the differentiation between these two acts is the procedure in which the act is adopted and not its content, as Slovakia and Hungary claim. PB - Beograd : Institut za političke studije T2 - Serbian Political Thought T1 - Analysis of the EU Measures Adopted in Response to Migrant Crisis: Principle of Institutional Balance and Typology of Legal Acts in the EU Revisited EP - 139 IS - 2 SP - 121 VL - 14 DO - 10.22182/spt.1422016.8 ER -
@article{ author = "Simentić Popović, Janja", year = "2016", abstract = "This article analyses measures that European Union adopted in response to migrant crisis, with a special emphasis on Decision 2015/1601 establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece. As Slovakia and Hungary filed actions for annulment of this Decision before Court of Justice of the European Union, their claims are taken as a starting point for the analysis. Therefore, this Decision is analyzed in the framework of the principle of institutional balance and the typology of legal acts in the EU. After the presentation of principle of institutional balance, re- search is focused on relation between the Council and European Council and European Parliament in the process of adoption of this Decision. It is concluded that the sole possible encroach upon the principle of institutional balance can be found in the Council’s neglection to reconsult the EP after the change in the initial content of the Decision (deletion of Hungary). As for the typology of acts in the EU, having in mind the process of evolution of the division between legislative and non-legislative acts, it is concluded that the main criteria for the differentiation between these two acts is the procedure in which the act is adopted and not its content, as Slovakia and Hungary claim.", publisher = "Beograd : Institut za političke studije", journal = "Serbian Political Thought", title = "Analysis of the EU Measures Adopted in Response to Migrant Crisis: Principle of Institutional Balance and Typology of Legal Acts in the EU Revisited", pages = "139-121", number = "2", volume = "14", doi = "10.22182/spt.1422016.8" }
Simentić Popović, J.. (2016). Analysis of the EU Measures Adopted in Response to Migrant Crisis: Principle of Institutional Balance and Typology of Legal Acts in the EU Revisited. in Serbian Political Thought Beograd : Institut za političke studije., 14(2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.22182/spt.1422016.8
Simentić Popović J. Analysis of the EU Measures Adopted in Response to Migrant Crisis: Principle of Institutional Balance and Typology of Legal Acts in the EU Revisited. in Serbian Political Thought. 2016;14(2):121-139. doi:10.22182/spt.1422016.8 .
Simentić Popović, Janja, "Analysis of the EU Measures Adopted in Response to Migrant Crisis: Principle of Institutional Balance and Typology of Legal Acts in the EU Revisited" in Serbian Political Thought, 14, no. 2 (2016):121-139, https://doi.org/10.22182/spt.1422016.8 . .