Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorSimić, Marina
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-02T12:23:25Z
dc.date.available2021-04-02T12:23:25Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1408-032X
dc.identifier.urihttp://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/686
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to discuss the meanings and scope of the ontological turn in contemporary anthropology. It discusses various other approaches usually labelled as "ontological" and explains the specificities of the ontological turn itself: reflexivity, conceptualisation, and experimentation. According to the primary authors of the ontological turn, Martin Holbraad and Morten Pedersen, ontology is not the base on which politics, culture, society builds, but the methodological assumptions that centre anthropological knowledge on ethnography as a concept-generating device. Although the ontological turn offers a radical platform for the study of the political, it has not had many followers in regional anthropology. This paper offers a few possible explanations for such a development.en
dc.publisherSlovene Anthropological Soc, Ljubljana
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/47021/RS//
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceAnthropological Notebooks
dc.subjectontological turnen
dc.subjectanthropologyen
dc.subjectEastern Europeen
dc.title(Not) turning in the Widening Gyre: The (im)possibility of the ontological turn in Eastern Europeen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage73
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.other24(2): 61-73
dc.citation.rankM23
dc.citation.spage61
dc.citation.volume24
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_686
dc.identifier.wos000465572500004
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Документи

ДатотекеВеличинаФорматПреглед

Уз овај запис нема датотека.

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу