An agreement as a basis of the competence of the International Court of Justice in disputes of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia v. member states of NATO

Abstract

In this text, the author analyzes the effect of the agreement to which, as a basis of the competence of the International Court of Justice, the Federal Republic has referred to in procedures against ten member states of NATO. The primary purpose of this analysis is to identify the effects resulting from the application of the consensuality principle both the effects of its particular expressions - mutuality and reciprocity principle - and the consensuality test effects contained in the provisions of Article 36.

Autor u ovom tekstu analizira dejstvo ugovora na koje se, kao osnov nadležnosti Međunarodnog suda pravde, SR Jugoslavija pozvala u postupcima protiv deset država članica NATO. Prevashodni cilj te analize je identifikacija efekata koje proizvodi primena načela konsensualnosti i to kako efekata njegovih posebnih izraza - načela uzajamnosti i reciprociteta -tako i efekata testa konsensualnosti koji je sadržan u odredbama člana 36.