Show simple item record

dc.creatorFagan, Adam
dc.creatorEjdus, Filip
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-02T12:30:42Z
dc.date.available2021-04-02T12:30:42Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn0964-4016
dc.identifier.urihttp://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/793
dc.description.abstractThe Don't let Belgrade D(r)own, protest movement against the city's controversial waterfront development, is one of the largest civil society campaigns in post-Milosevic Serbia. Despite engaging an eclectic mix of activists, there has been no tangible participation by Belgrade's well-established environmental NGOs (ENGOs). The absence of ENGOs is all the more surprising given the project's well-documented threat to surface water, increased risk of flooding, and air pollution. The extant literature would suggest that EU enlargement, distancing of green organisations from domestic grassroots agendas as a consequence of external donor funding, and widespread NGO fatigue are to blame. In addition to these explanations, we contend that the limited participation of ENGOs was also due to ideological differences and initial framing of the activism by those who had emerged from, and become disenchanted with, the NGO sector.en
dc.publisherRoutledge Taylor & Francis Group
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceEnvironmental Politics
dc.subjectProtesten
dc.subjectmovementsen
dc.subjectenvironmental activismen
dc.subjecturban developmenten
dc.subjectserbiaen
dc.titleLost at the waterfront? Explaining the absence of green organisations in theDon't let Belgrade D(r)ownmovementen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.rankaM21~
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09644016.2020.1720473
dc.identifier.rcubconv_1431
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85085974530
dc.identifier.wos000539989800001
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record