The expansion of international society after 30 years: Views from the European periphery
Samo za registrovane korisnike
2014
Članak u časopisu (Objavljena verzija)
Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentuApstrakt
Since its publication three decades ago, Hedley Bull and Adam Watson's The Expansion of International Society has served as the main point of departure for historically informed discussion of how today's states system emerged and then went on to envelop the world. In a recent article, Iver Neumann criticized Bull and Watson's conceptualization for being Euro-centric, in the sense that these scholars only ascribed agency to the European side of the relationship between an entrant and international society. For International Relations, it is particularly apposite that the new entrants to international society themselves came from suzerain systems, such as Habsburg-dominated or the Ottoman-dominated one. Neumann's example was Russia, whose experiences with Mongol suzerainty and, before that, with being a part of a suzerain system centred on Byzantium, infused Muscovy with experiences and memories that formed the reference point for what to expect when getting in contact with international... society. This forum broadens this debate by looking not only at one state, but at a set of Central and South-Eastern European states with experiences and memories from various suzerain systems. The articles discuss when and how Romania, Slovakia, Serbia and Turkey began to aspire for membership in international society; experiences, memories and ideas such as translatio imperii that informed what they made of the entry; and how and in what degree the ensuing tensions remain today.
Ključne reči:
Adam Watson / English school / Hedley Bull / international society / memories / Romania / Serbia / Slovakia / suzerainty / TurkeyIzvor:
International Relations, 2014, 28, 4, 445-445Izdavač:
- Sage Publications Ltd, London
DOI: 10.1177/0047117814553043
ISSN: 0047-1178
WoS: 000346015000004
Scopus: 2-s2.0-84916595727
Kolekcije
Institucija/grupa
FPNTY - JOUR AU - Ejdus, Filip PY - 2014 UR - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/467 AB - Since its publication three decades ago, Hedley Bull and Adam Watson's The Expansion of International Society has served as the main point of departure for historically informed discussion of how today's states system emerged and then went on to envelop the world. In a recent article, Iver Neumann criticized Bull and Watson's conceptualization for being Euro-centric, in the sense that these scholars only ascribed agency to the European side of the relationship between an entrant and international society. For International Relations, it is particularly apposite that the new entrants to international society themselves came from suzerain systems, such as Habsburg-dominated or the Ottoman-dominated one. Neumann's example was Russia, whose experiences with Mongol suzerainty and, before that, with being a part of a suzerain system centred on Byzantium, infused Muscovy with experiences and memories that formed the reference point for what to expect when getting in contact with international society. This forum broadens this debate by looking not only at one state, but at a set of Central and South-Eastern European states with experiences and memories from various suzerain systems. The articles discuss when and how Romania, Slovakia, Serbia and Turkey began to aspire for membership in international society; experiences, memories and ideas such as translatio imperii that informed what they made of the entry; and how and in what degree the ensuing tensions remain today. PB - Sage Publications Ltd, London T2 - International Relations T1 - The expansion of international society after 30 years: Views from the European periphery EP - 445 IS - 4 SP - 445 VL - 28 DO - 10.1177/0047117814553043 ER -
@article{ author = "Ejdus, Filip", year = "2014", abstract = "Since its publication three decades ago, Hedley Bull and Adam Watson's The Expansion of International Society has served as the main point of departure for historically informed discussion of how today's states system emerged and then went on to envelop the world. In a recent article, Iver Neumann criticized Bull and Watson's conceptualization for being Euro-centric, in the sense that these scholars only ascribed agency to the European side of the relationship between an entrant and international society. For International Relations, it is particularly apposite that the new entrants to international society themselves came from suzerain systems, such as Habsburg-dominated or the Ottoman-dominated one. Neumann's example was Russia, whose experiences with Mongol suzerainty and, before that, with being a part of a suzerain system centred on Byzantium, infused Muscovy with experiences and memories that formed the reference point for what to expect when getting in contact with international society. This forum broadens this debate by looking not only at one state, but at a set of Central and South-Eastern European states with experiences and memories from various suzerain systems. The articles discuss when and how Romania, Slovakia, Serbia and Turkey began to aspire for membership in international society; experiences, memories and ideas such as translatio imperii that informed what they made of the entry; and how and in what degree the ensuing tensions remain today.", publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd, London", journal = "International Relations", title = "The expansion of international society after 30 years: Views from the European periphery", pages = "445-445", number = "4", volume = "28", doi = "10.1177/0047117814553043" }
Ejdus, F.. (2014). The expansion of international society after 30 years: Views from the European periphery. in International Relations Sage Publications Ltd, London., 28(4), 445-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117814553043
Ejdus F. The expansion of international society after 30 years: Views from the European periphery. in International Relations. 2014;28(4):445-445. doi:10.1177/0047117814553043 .
Ejdus, Filip, "The expansion of international society after 30 years: Views from the European periphery" in International Relations, 28, no. 4 (2014):445-445, https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117814553043 . .