Urban Regeneration Policy in Serbia- three case studies from Belgrade
Чланак у часопису (Објављена верзија)
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
This article presents the way of creation of urban and spatial policy in Belgrade, the capital of
Serbia, as transitional society. This ambience characterizes insufficient normative regulation,
weak institutions, small transparency in decision making process, insufficient participation of
important professional subjects in big projects, corruption and ad hoc arrangements which
seriously favor private and group interests (income, profit) over public interests etc.
Text has three case studies: Belgrade Port is an example for misuse of privatization procedure
for getting valuable cities` lots and building land cheaply; Resettlement of wild Roma
settlements represents ad hoc project which "cleaned" vital city locations without plan, and with
jeopardizing elementary human rights of this ethnic group; and ambitions project Belgrade
Waterfront (redevelopment of Sava amphitheater) has been created as arrangement between top
Serbian leadership and foreign company, without including pu...blic and domestic experts and their
associations in this project. The most important missing factors are: project justification study,
"value for money" analysis, risk matrix, clear share of responsibilities for the risks between
partners, and guarantees given by private partner for protection of Belgrade concerning various
risks, absence of public competition, as well as absence of monitoring mechanisms for contract
implementation.
Кључне речи:
urban planning / spatial planning / zoning / land purpose conversion / urban regeneration / urban sustainability / resettlement / social inclusion / corruptionИзвор:
Forum of Foreing Languages, Politology and International Regaltions, 2018, 10, 1, 78-86Издавач:
- Sládkovičovo : Danubius University
Колекције
Институција/група
FPNTY - JOUR AU - Đorđević, Snežana S. PY - 2018 UR - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1201 AB - This article presents the way of creation of urban and spatial policy in Belgrade, the capital of Serbia, as transitional society. This ambience characterizes insufficient normative regulation, weak institutions, small transparency in decision making process, insufficient participation of important professional subjects in big projects, corruption and ad hoc arrangements which seriously favor private and group interests (income, profit) over public interests etc. Text has three case studies: Belgrade Port is an example for misuse of privatization procedure for getting valuable cities` lots and building land cheaply; Resettlement of wild Roma settlements represents ad hoc project which "cleaned" vital city locations without plan, and with jeopardizing elementary human rights of this ethnic group; and ambitions project Belgrade Waterfront (redevelopment of Sava amphitheater) has been created as arrangement between top Serbian leadership and foreign company, without including public and domestic experts and their associations in this project. The most important missing factors are: project justification study, "value for money" analysis, risk matrix, clear share of responsibilities for the risks between partners, and guarantees given by private partner for protection of Belgrade concerning various risks, absence of public competition, as well as absence of monitoring mechanisms for contract implementation. PB - Sládkovičovo : Danubius University T2 - Forum of Foreing Languages, Politology and International Regaltions T1 - Urban Regeneration Policy in Serbia- three case studies from Belgrade EP - 86 IS - 1 SP - 78 VL - 10 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1201 ER -
@article{ author = "Đorđević, Snežana S.", year = "2018", abstract = "This article presents the way of creation of urban and spatial policy in Belgrade, the capital of Serbia, as transitional society. This ambience characterizes insufficient normative regulation, weak institutions, small transparency in decision making process, insufficient participation of important professional subjects in big projects, corruption and ad hoc arrangements which seriously favor private and group interests (income, profit) over public interests etc. Text has three case studies: Belgrade Port is an example for misuse of privatization procedure for getting valuable cities` lots and building land cheaply; Resettlement of wild Roma settlements represents ad hoc project which "cleaned" vital city locations without plan, and with jeopardizing elementary human rights of this ethnic group; and ambitions project Belgrade Waterfront (redevelopment of Sava amphitheater) has been created as arrangement between top Serbian leadership and foreign company, without including public and domestic experts and their associations in this project. The most important missing factors are: project justification study, "value for money" analysis, risk matrix, clear share of responsibilities for the risks between partners, and guarantees given by private partner for protection of Belgrade concerning various risks, absence of public competition, as well as absence of monitoring mechanisms for contract implementation.", publisher = "Sládkovičovo : Danubius University", journal = "Forum of Foreing Languages, Politology and International Regaltions", title = "Urban Regeneration Policy in Serbia- three case studies from Belgrade", pages = "86-78", number = "1", volume = "10", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1201" }
Đorđević, S. S.. (2018). Urban Regeneration Policy in Serbia- three case studies from Belgrade. in Forum of Foreing Languages, Politology and International Regaltions Sládkovičovo : Danubius University., 10(1), 78-86. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1201
Đorđević SS. Urban Regeneration Policy in Serbia- three case studies from Belgrade. in Forum of Foreing Languages, Politology and International Regaltions. 2018;10(1):78-86. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1201 .
Đorđević, Snežana S., "Urban Regeneration Policy in Serbia- three case studies from Belgrade" in Forum of Foreing Languages, Politology and International Regaltions, 10, no. 1 (2018):78-86, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1201 .