RFPN - Faculty of Political Science Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Political Science
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RFPN
  • FPN
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
  • View Item
  •   RFPN
  • FPN
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Judicial proceedings and reconciliation: Croatian and Serbian claims for the genocide before the International Court of Justice

Sudski procesi i pomirenje - tužbe za genocid Srbije i Hrvatske pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde

Thumbnail
2014
450.pdf (87.47Kb)
Authors
Simentić, Janja
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Justice is one of the main components of the process of reconciliation. When materialized in its institutionalized form, justice is achieved through trials, whether to individuals or states. In the case of war in former Yugoslavia apart from the trials to the individuals before International Tribunal for former Yugoslavia, equally important and current issue is the case before International Court of Justice regarding the claim and counter-claim of Croatia and Serbia concerning the crime of genocide. Through the analysis of this judicial proceeding using the concept of change in the conflictive ethos it is shown that it does not per se contribute to the reconciliation. Reasons for that are to be found in the very nature of the judicial proceedings and discrepancies between legal and social norms and understandings of justice. Nevertheless the importance of judicial proceedings is not denied as a structural measure in the reconciliation process therefore suggestions for the overcoming of... deficiencies in the contribution of these proceedings to the reconciliation are offered.

Pravda je jedan od osnovnih činilaca procesa pomirenja. Iskazana u institucionalizovanom obliku, pravda se sprovodi putem suđenja, bilo pojedincima, bilo državama. U slučaju rata u bivšoj Jugoslaviji, pored suđenja pojedincima pred Međunarodnim krivičnim tribunalom za bivšu Jugoslaviju, važno je i aktuelno pitanje tužbe i protivtužbe Hrvatske i Srbije pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde u vezi sa zločinom genocida. Analizirajući ovaj sudski proces sa stanovišta promene konfliktnog etosa, ukazano je na to da ovaj sudski proces sam po sebi ne vodi pomirenju. Razlozi za to nalaze se u samoj prirodi sudskih postupaka i diskrepanci između pravnih i društvenih normi i shvatanja pravde. Pa ipak, važnost sudskih postupaka kao strukturne mere u procesu pomirenja nije poreknuta, te su dati predlozi za prevazilaženje navedene manjkavosti u pogledu doprinosa sudskih procesa pomirenju.
Keywords:
reconciliation / conflictive ethos / justice / genocide / International Court of Justice / pomirenje / konfliktni etos / pravda / genocid / Međunarodni sud pravde
Source:
Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 2014, 8, 12, 59-74
Publisher:
  • Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd
Funding / projects:
  • Serbia’s political identity in the regional and global context (RS-179076)

DOI: 10.5937/GodFPN1412059S

ISSN: 1820-6700

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/453
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
Institution/Community
FPN
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Simentić, Janja
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/453
AB  - Justice is one of the main components of the process of reconciliation. When materialized in its institutionalized form, justice is achieved through trials, whether to individuals or states. In the case of war in former Yugoslavia apart from the trials to the individuals before International Tribunal for former Yugoslavia, equally important and current issue is the case before International Court of Justice regarding the claim and counter-claim of Croatia and Serbia concerning the crime of genocide. Through the analysis of this judicial proceeding using the concept of change in the conflictive ethos it is shown that it does not per se contribute to the reconciliation. Reasons for that are to be found in the very nature of the judicial proceedings and discrepancies between legal and social norms and understandings of justice. Nevertheless the importance of judicial proceedings is not denied as a structural measure in the reconciliation process therefore suggestions for the overcoming of deficiencies in the contribution of these proceedings to the reconciliation are offered.
AB  - Pravda je jedan od osnovnih činilaca procesa pomirenja. Iskazana u institucionalizovanom obliku, pravda se sprovodi putem suđenja, bilo pojedincima, bilo državama. U slučaju rata u bivšoj Jugoslaviji, pored suđenja pojedincima pred Međunarodnim krivičnim tribunalom za bivšu Jugoslaviju, važno je i aktuelno pitanje tužbe i protivtužbe Hrvatske i Srbije pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde u vezi sa zločinom genocida. Analizirajući ovaj sudski proces sa stanovišta promene konfliktnog etosa, ukazano je na to da ovaj sudski proces sam po sebi ne vodi pomirenju. Razlozi za to nalaze se u samoj prirodi sudskih postupaka i diskrepanci između pravnih i društvenih normi i shvatanja pravde. Pa ipak, važnost sudskih postupaka kao strukturne mere u procesu pomirenja nije poreknuta, te su dati predlozi za prevazilaženje navedene manjkavosti u pogledu doprinosa sudskih procesa pomirenju.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd
T2  - Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka
T1  - Judicial proceedings and reconciliation: Croatian and Serbian claims for the genocide before the International Court of Justice
T1  - Sudski procesi i pomirenje - tužbe za genocid Srbije i Hrvatske pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde
EP  - 74
IS  - 12
SP  - 59
VL  - 8
DO  - 10.5937/GodFPN1412059S
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Simentić, Janja",
year = "2014",
abstract = "Justice is one of the main components of the process of reconciliation. When materialized in its institutionalized form, justice is achieved through trials, whether to individuals or states. In the case of war in former Yugoslavia apart from the trials to the individuals before International Tribunal for former Yugoslavia, equally important and current issue is the case before International Court of Justice regarding the claim and counter-claim of Croatia and Serbia concerning the crime of genocide. Through the analysis of this judicial proceeding using the concept of change in the conflictive ethos it is shown that it does not per se contribute to the reconciliation. Reasons for that are to be found in the very nature of the judicial proceedings and discrepancies between legal and social norms and understandings of justice. Nevertheless the importance of judicial proceedings is not denied as a structural measure in the reconciliation process therefore suggestions for the overcoming of deficiencies in the contribution of these proceedings to the reconciliation are offered., Pravda je jedan od osnovnih činilaca procesa pomirenja. Iskazana u institucionalizovanom obliku, pravda se sprovodi putem suđenja, bilo pojedincima, bilo državama. U slučaju rata u bivšoj Jugoslaviji, pored suđenja pojedincima pred Međunarodnim krivičnim tribunalom za bivšu Jugoslaviju, važno je i aktuelno pitanje tužbe i protivtužbe Hrvatske i Srbije pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde u vezi sa zločinom genocida. Analizirajući ovaj sudski proces sa stanovišta promene konfliktnog etosa, ukazano je na to da ovaj sudski proces sam po sebi ne vodi pomirenju. Razlozi za to nalaze se u samoj prirodi sudskih postupaka i diskrepanci između pravnih i društvenih normi i shvatanja pravde. Pa ipak, važnost sudskih postupaka kao strukturne mere u procesu pomirenja nije poreknuta, te su dati predlozi za prevazilaženje navedene manjkavosti u pogledu doprinosa sudskih procesa pomirenju.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd",
journal = "Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka",
title = "Judicial proceedings and reconciliation: Croatian and Serbian claims for the genocide before the International Court of Justice, Sudski procesi i pomirenje - tužbe za genocid Srbije i Hrvatske pred Međunarodnim sudom pravde",
pages = "74-59",
number = "12",
volume = "8",
doi = "10.5937/GodFPN1412059S"
}
Simentić, J.. (2014). Judicial proceedings and reconciliation: Croatian and Serbian claims for the genocide before the International Court of Justice. in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd., 8(12), 59-74.
https://doi.org/10.5937/GodFPN1412059S
Simentić J. Judicial proceedings and reconciliation: Croatian and Serbian claims for the genocide before the International Court of Justice. in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka. 2014;8(12):59-74.
doi:10.5937/GodFPN1412059S .
Simentić, Janja, "Judicial proceedings and reconciliation: Croatian and Serbian claims for the genocide before the International Court of Justice" in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 8, no. 12 (2014):59-74,
https://doi.org/10.5937/GodFPN1412059S . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RFPN | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RFPN | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB