Abe doctrine and Japan’s foreign policy
Abeova doktrina i japanska spoljna politika
Abstract
While apparently preserving general course and framework of Japan’s post-war foreign and security order, Prime Minister Abe has actually initiated complex and controversial changes in their context that have caused simultaneous support, uneasiness and strong criticism at home and abroad. His concept of ‘active contributor to peace’ has added to growing dynamism of ongoing rebalancing of power in Asia-Pacific and on the other hand, emphasized regional and global role of Japan.
Pokušavajući da sačuva opšti okvir japanske posleratne spoljne i bezbednosne politike, premijer Abe je započeo njihove složene i kontroverzne promene koje su istovremeno izazvale podršku, ali i oštre kritike u zemlji i inostranstvu. Njegov kontekst “aktivnog doprinosa miru” s jedne strane uneo je dinamiku u rebalans moći u azijsko-pacifičkom regionu, a s druge strane naglasio regionalnuiI globalnu ulogu Japana.
Keywords:
Abe Shinzo / Abe Doctrine / Japan / ‘active contributor to peace’ / Abe Šinzo / Abeova doktrina / “aktivni doprinos miru”Source:
Review of International Affairs, 2015, 66, 1157, 5-26Publisher:
- Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd
Collections
Institution/Community
FPNTY - JOUR AU - Mitrović, Dragana PY - 2015 UR - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/499 AB - While apparently preserving general course and framework of Japan’s post-war foreign and security order, Prime Minister Abe has actually initiated complex and controversial changes in their context that have caused simultaneous support, uneasiness and strong criticism at home and abroad. His concept of ‘active contributor to peace’ has added to growing dynamism of ongoing rebalancing of power in Asia-Pacific and on the other hand, emphasized regional and global role of Japan. AB - Pokušavajući da sačuva opšti okvir japanske posleratne spoljne i bezbednosne politike, premijer Abe je započeo njihove složene i kontroverzne promene koje su istovremeno izazvale podršku, ali i oštre kritike u zemlji i inostranstvu. Njegov kontekst “aktivnog doprinosa miru” s jedne strane uneo je dinamiku u rebalans moći u azijsko-pacifičkom regionu, a s druge strane naglasio regionalnuiI globalnu ulogu Japana. PB - Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd T2 - Review of International Affairs T1 - Abe doctrine and Japan’s foreign policy T1 - Abeova doktrina i japanska spoljna politika EP - 26 IS - 1157 SP - 5 VL - 66 ER -
@article{ author = "Mitrović, Dragana", year = "2015", abstract = "While apparently preserving general course and framework of Japan’s post-war foreign and security order, Prime Minister Abe has actually initiated complex and controversial changes in their context that have caused simultaneous support, uneasiness and strong criticism at home and abroad. His concept of ‘active contributor to peace’ has added to growing dynamism of ongoing rebalancing of power in Asia-Pacific and on the other hand, emphasized regional and global role of Japan., Pokušavajući da sačuva opšti okvir japanske posleratne spoljne i bezbednosne politike, premijer Abe je započeo njihove složene i kontroverzne promene koje su istovremeno izazvale podršku, ali i oštre kritike u zemlji i inostranstvu. Njegov kontekst “aktivnog doprinosa miru” s jedne strane uneo je dinamiku u rebalans moći u azijsko-pacifičkom regionu, a s druge strane naglasio regionalnuiI globalnu ulogu Japana.", publisher = "Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd", journal = "Review of International Affairs", title = "Abe doctrine and Japan’s foreign policy, Abeova doktrina i japanska spoljna politika", pages = "26-5", number = "1157", volume = "66" }
Mitrović, D.. (2015). Abe doctrine and Japan’s foreign policy. in Review of International Affairs Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd., 66(1157), 5-26.
Mitrović D. Abe doctrine and Japan’s foreign policy. in Review of International Affairs. 2015;66(1157):5-26..
Mitrović, Dragana, "Abe doctrine and Japan’s foreign policy" in Review of International Affairs, 66, no. 1157 (2015):5-26.