RFPN - Faculty of Political Science Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Political Science
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RFPN
  • FPN
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
  • View Item
  •   RFPN
  • FPN
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Judicial activism in protection against discrimination

Sudski aktivizam u zaštiti od diskriminacije

Thumbnail
2016
584.pdf (116.3Kb)
Authors
Pavlović, Dejan
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to provide the proposal for a feasible and effective model that the Constitutional Court of BH could utilize to remedy the problem of the constitutional-based discrimination of minorities within the electoral process in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The issue at stake came into focus of legal and political science scholars after the ECtHR delivered its famous decision in case Sejdic-Finci in December 2009. The proposed approach of the Constitutional Court of BH is to increase its judicial activism, since it is the only stakeholder equipped with the necessary tools for resolving the problem that brought the political elites into a deadlock.
U radu se predlaže model prevazilaženja problema na ustavu zasnovane diskriminacije manjina i izbornom procesu u BiH. Ovo pitanje se našlo u žiži evropske stručne javnosti nakon što je Evropski sud za ljudska prava doneo čuvenu presudu u slučaju Sejdić i Finci protiv BiH (decembar 2009), a potom je potvrdio u slučaju Zornić (jul 2014) i slučaju Pilav (jun 2016). Predloženi pristup i argumentacija zasnovani su na većem sudskom aktivizmu Ustavnog suda BiH, kao jedinog aktera koji ima na raspolaganju odgovarajuće i efektivne instrumente da bi se prevazišao problem. Rešenje problema u političkoj sferi, kao najčešće predlagana alternativa, do danas nije dala rezultate, imajući u vidu nespremnost političkih elita da pristupe temeljnim ustavnim promenama.
Keywords:
judicial activism / prohibition of discrimination / minority rights / judicial review / sudski aktivizam / kontrola ustavnosti / zabrana diskriminacije / manjinska prava
Source:
Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 2016, 10, 15, 105-115
Publisher:
  • Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd
Funding / projects:
  • Serbia’s political identity in the regional and global context (RS-179076)

ISSN: 1820-6700

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_587
URI
http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/587
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
Institution/Community
FPN
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pavlović, Dejan
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/587
AB  - The aim of this paper is to provide the proposal for a feasible and effective model that the Constitutional Court of BH could utilize to remedy the problem of the constitutional-based discrimination of minorities within the electoral process in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The issue at stake came into focus of legal and political science scholars after the ECtHR delivered its famous decision in case Sejdic-Finci in December 2009. The proposed approach of the Constitutional Court of BH is to increase its judicial activism, since it is the only stakeholder equipped with the necessary tools for resolving the problem that brought the political elites into a deadlock.
AB  - U radu se predlaže model prevazilaženja problema na ustavu zasnovane diskriminacije manjina i izbornom procesu u BiH. Ovo pitanje se našlo u žiži evropske stručne javnosti nakon što je Evropski sud za ljudska prava doneo čuvenu presudu u slučaju Sejdić i Finci protiv BiH (decembar 2009), a potom je potvrdio u slučaju Zornić (jul 2014) i slučaju Pilav (jun 2016). Predloženi pristup i argumentacija zasnovani su na većem sudskom aktivizmu Ustavnog suda BiH, kao jedinog aktera koji ima na raspolaganju odgovarajuće i efektivne instrumente da bi se prevazišao problem. Rešenje problema u političkoj sferi, kao najčešće predlagana alternativa, do danas nije dala rezultate, imajući u vidu nespremnost političkih elita da pristupe temeljnim ustavnim promenama.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd
T2  - Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka
T1  - Judicial activism in protection against discrimination
T1  - Sudski aktivizam u zaštiti od diskriminacije
EP  - 115
IS  - 15
SP  - 105
VL  - 10
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Pavlović, Dejan",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to provide the proposal for a feasible and effective model that the Constitutional Court of BH could utilize to remedy the problem of the constitutional-based discrimination of minorities within the electoral process in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The issue at stake came into focus of legal and political science scholars after the ECtHR delivered its famous decision in case Sejdic-Finci in December 2009. The proposed approach of the Constitutional Court of BH is to increase its judicial activism, since it is the only stakeholder equipped with the necessary tools for resolving the problem that brought the political elites into a deadlock., U radu se predlaže model prevazilaženja problema na ustavu zasnovane diskriminacije manjina i izbornom procesu u BiH. Ovo pitanje se našlo u žiži evropske stručne javnosti nakon što je Evropski sud za ljudska prava doneo čuvenu presudu u slučaju Sejdić i Finci protiv BiH (decembar 2009), a potom je potvrdio u slučaju Zornić (jul 2014) i slučaju Pilav (jun 2016). Predloženi pristup i argumentacija zasnovani su na većem sudskom aktivizmu Ustavnog suda BiH, kao jedinog aktera koji ima na raspolaganju odgovarajuće i efektivne instrumente da bi se prevazišao problem. Rešenje problema u političkoj sferi, kao najčešće predlagana alternativa, do danas nije dala rezultate, imajući u vidu nespremnost političkih elita da pristupe temeljnim ustavnim promenama.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd",
journal = "Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka",
title = "Judicial activism in protection against discrimination, Sudski aktivizam u zaštiti od diskriminacije",
pages = "115-105",
number = "15",
volume = "10"
}
Pavlović, D.. (2016). Judicial activism in protection against discrimination. in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd., 10(15), 105-115.
Pavlović D. Judicial activism in protection against discrimination. in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka. 2016;10(15):105-115..
Pavlović, Dejan, "Judicial activism in protection against discrimination" in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 10, no. 15 (2016):105-115.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RFPN | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RFPN | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB