Social construction of (post)postsocialist reality: Ethnographic research into the everyday
Socijalna konstrukcija (post)postsocijalističke realnosti - etnografsko istraživanje svakodnevnog
Abstract
In this paper, I want to discuss the main proposition from Berger and Luckmann's seminal book, the social construction of reality (or. 1966) - the idea that the everyday is the arena through which the social world comes into being--and to pair it with the understanding of memories and everyday life in postsocialist studies. It seems that various disciplines dealing with postsocialism sometimes treat the memories of socialism as an untheorized background of the analysis. I propose that postsocialist studies should do better by actively engaging in understanding the memories of socialism (and its aftermath) as an active force in shaping the present that should be addressed not only through the narratives of the past, but through the concept of the "everyday." for that purpose, I deploy the contemporary Western idea of ethnography as a specific qualitative study of the present that can be a useful tool for the understanding of society and social reality in the way they are described by Be...rger and Luckmann. I believe that Berger and Luckmann's account may shed new light on some of the central topics of related to the post-Yugoslav predicament (like the state, society, morality, and "normality") and I offer new readings of some scholarly works that deal with these concepts (including my own).
U ovom radu analizira se jedna od osnovnih teza Bergera i Lukmana izneta u poznatoj knjizi Socijalna konstrukcija stvarnosti (or. 1966) po kojoj su prostor i vreme svakodnevice ključni za rauzmevanje načina na koji nastaje naša socijalna stvarnost. Polazeći od postulata Bergera i Lukmana, autorka ukazuje na mogućnost upotrebe etnografije kao teorijsko-metodološkog okvira za razumevanje postsocijalističke transformacije u Evropi. Objašnjavajući značenje ovog pojma, autorka predlaže da se uloga sećanja (i na socijalizam i na prve godine "tranzicije") u razumevanju sadašnjice i zamišljanju budućnosti sagleda posredstvom analize svakodnevnih praksi, umesto uobičajenog fokusa na narative. Koristeći navedeni teorijsko-metodološki okvir, autorka nudi novo čitanje nekih od centralnih tema postsocijalističke transformacije u Srbiji, kao što su društo, država, moral i "normalnost".
Keywords:
social construction of reality / everyday life / ethnography / (post)postsocialism / socijalna konstrukcija stvarnosti / svakodnevni život / etnografija / (post)postsocijalizamSource:
Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU, 2019, 67, 1, 121-134Publisher:
- Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd
Funding / projects:
- Cultural heritage and identity (RS-177026)
Collections
Institution/Community
FPNTY - JOUR AU - Simić, Marina AU - Simić, Marina PY - 2019 UR - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/723 AB - In this paper, I want to discuss the main proposition from Berger and Luckmann's seminal book, the social construction of reality (or. 1966) - the idea that the everyday is the arena through which the social world comes into being--and to pair it with the understanding of memories and everyday life in postsocialist studies. It seems that various disciplines dealing with postsocialism sometimes treat the memories of socialism as an untheorized background of the analysis. I propose that postsocialist studies should do better by actively engaging in understanding the memories of socialism (and its aftermath) as an active force in shaping the present that should be addressed not only through the narratives of the past, but through the concept of the "everyday." for that purpose, I deploy the contemporary Western idea of ethnography as a specific qualitative study of the present that can be a useful tool for the understanding of society and social reality in the way they are described by Berger and Luckmann. I believe that Berger and Luckmann's account may shed new light on some of the central topics of related to the post-Yugoslav predicament (like the state, society, morality, and "normality") and I offer new readings of some scholarly works that deal with these concepts (including my own). AB - U ovom radu analizira se jedna od osnovnih teza Bergera i Lukmana izneta u poznatoj knjizi Socijalna konstrukcija stvarnosti (or. 1966) po kojoj su prostor i vreme svakodnevice ključni za rauzmevanje načina na koji nastaje naša socijalna stvarnost. Polazeći od postulata Bergera i Lukmana, autorka ukazuje na mogućnost upotrebe etnografije kao teorijsko-metodološkog okvira za razumevanje postsocijalističke transformacije u Evropi. Objašnjavajući značenje ovog pojma, autorka predlaže da se uloga sećanja (i na socijalizam i na prve godine "tranzicije") u razumevanju sadašnjice i zamišljanju budućnosti sagleda posredstvom analize svakodnevnih praksi, umesto uobičajenog fokusa na narative. Koristeći navedeni teorijsko-metodološki okvir, autorka nudi novo čitanje nekih od centralnih tema postsocijalističke transformacije u Srbiji, kao što su društo, država, moral i "normalnost". PB - Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd T2 - Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU T1 - Social construction of (post)postsocialist reality: Ethnographic research into the everyday T1 - Socijalna konstrukcija (post)postsocijalističke realnosti - etnografsko istraživanje svakodnevnog EP - 134 IS - 1 SP - 121 VL - 67 DO - 10.2298/GEI1901121S ER -
@article{ author = "Simić, Marina and Simić, Marina", year = "2019", abstract = "In this paper, I want to discuss the main proposition from Berger and Luckmann's seminal book, the social construction of reality (or. 1966) - the idea that the everyday is the arena through which the social world comes into being--and to pair it with the understanding of memories and everyday life in postsocialist studies. It seems that various disciplines dealing with postsocialism sometimes treat the memories of socialism as an untheorized background of the analysis. I propose that postsocialist studies should do better by actively engaging in understanding the memories of socialism (and its aftermath) as an active force in shaping the present that should be addressed not only through the narratives of the past, but through the concept of the "everyday." for that purpose, I deploy the contemporary Western idea of ethnography as a specific qualitative study of the present that can be a useful tool for the understanding of society and social reality in the way they are described by Berger and Luckmann. I believe that Berger and Luckmann's account may shed new light on some of the central topics of related to the post-Yugoslav predicament (like the state, society, morality, and "normality") and I offer new readings of some scholarly works that deal with these concepts (including my own)., U ovom radu analizira se jedna od osnovnih teza Bergera i Lukmana izneta u poznatoj knjizi Socijalna konstrukcija stvarnosti (or. 1966) po kojoj su prostor i vreme svakodnevice ključni za rauzmevanje načina na koji nastaje naša socijalna stvarnost. Polazeći od postulata Bergera i Lukmana, autorka ukazuje na mogućnost upotrebe etnografije kao teorijsko-metodološkog okvira za razumevanje postsocijalističke transformacije u Evropi. Objašnjavajući značenje ovog pojma, autorka predlaže da se uloga sećanja (i na socijalizam i na prve godine "tranzicije") u razumevanju sadašnjice i zamišljanju budućnosti sagleda posredstvom analize svakodnevnih praksi, umesto uobičajenog fokusa na narative. Koristeći navedeni teorijsko-metodološki okvir, autorka nudi novo čitanje nekih od centralnih tema postsocijalističke transformacije u Srbiji, kao što su društo, država, moral i "normalnost".", publisher = "Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd", journal = "Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU", title = "Social construction of (post)postsocialist reality: Ethnographic research into the everyday, Socijalna konstrukcija (post)postsocijalističke realnosti - etnografsko istraživanje svakodnevnog", pages = "134-121", number = "1", volume = "67", doi = "10.2298/GEI1901121S" }
Simić, M.,& Simić, M.. (2019). Social construction of (post)postsocialist reality: Ethnographic research into the everyday. in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd., 67(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1901121S
Simić M, Simić M. Social construction of (post)postsocialist reality: Ethnographic research into the everyday. in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU. 2019;67(1):121-134. doi:10.2298/GEI1901121S .
Simić, Marina, Simić, Marina, "Social construction of (post)postsocialist reality: Ethnographic research into the everyday" in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU, 67, no. 1 (2019):121-134, https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1901121S . .