There is no need to push the bus. An analysis of Berger-Luckmann's philosophy without philosophy
Autobus ni ne treba gurati. Analiza Berger-Lukmanove filosofije bez filosofije
Apstrakt
This paper examines the theoretical decision of Berger and Luckmann to place and develope the question of social constructionism on the other side of philosophy. By the immanent textual analysis, within the relevant epistemological environment, it is shown that their position is rich in philosophical assumptions and consequences, and the most problematic is the abolition of the autonomy of the intentional objectivity. Both the exclusion of philosophy and the unreflective "dealing" with her exposed Berger-Luckman's social constructionism to serious, in this paper raised objections.
U ovom članku preispituje se temeljna teorijska odluka Bergera i Lukmana da pitanje socijalnog konstrukcionizma drže i razvijaju s one strane filosofije. Imanentnom tekstualnom analizom, unutar relevantnog epistemološkog okruženja, pokazuje se da je njihova postavka bogata i filosofskim pretpostavkama i konsekvencijama, a najproblematičnije je ukidanje smisaone samostalnosti intencionalne predmetnosti. I isključenje filosofije i nereflektovano "bavljenje" njome Berger-Lukmanov socijalni konstrukcionizam izlažu ozbiljnim, u ovom radu iznesenim prigovorima.
Ključne reči:
Social constructionism / Berger-Luckmann / interpretationalism / epistemology / Realism / Socijalni konstrukcionizam / Berger-Lukman / interpretacionizam / epistemologija / realizamIzvor:
Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU, 2019, 67, 1, 63-76Izdavač:
- Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd
Kolekcije
Institucija/grupa
FPNTY - JOUR AU - Koprivica, Časlav AU - Koprivica, Časlav PY - 2019 UR - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/737 AB - This paper examines the theoretical decision of Berger and Luckmann to place and develope the question of social constructionism on the other side of philosophy. By the immanent textual analysis, within the relevant epistemological environment, it is shown that their position is rich in philosophical assumptions and consequences, and the most problematic is the abolition of the autonomy of the intentional objectivity. Both the exclusion of philosophy and the unreflective "dealing" with her exposed Berger-Luckman's social constructionism to serious, in this paper raised objections. AB - U ovom članku preispituje se temeljna teorijska odluka Bergera i Lukmana da pitanje socijalnog konstrukcionizma drže i razvijaju s one strane filosofije. Imanentnom tekstualnom analizom, unutar relevantnog epistemološkog okruženja, pokazuje se da je njihova postavka bogata i filosofskim pretpostavkama i konsekvencijama, a najproblematičnije je ukidanje smisaone samostalnosti intencionalne predmetnosti. I isključenje filosofije i nereflektovano "bavljenje" njome Berger-Lukmanov socijalni konstrukcionizam izlažu ozbiljnim, u ovom radu iznesenim prigovorima. PB - Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd T2 - Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU T1 - There is no need to push the bus. An analysis of Berger-Luckmann's philosophy without philosophy T1 - Autobus ni ne treba gurati. Analiza Berger-Lukmanove filosofije bez filosofije EP - 76 IS - 1 SP - 63 VL - 67 DO - 10.2298/GEI1901063K ER -
@article{ author = "Koprivica, Časlav and Koprivica, Časlav", year = "2019", abstract = "This paper examines the theoretical decision of Berger and Luckmann to place and develope the question of social constructionism on the other side of philosophy. By the immanent textual analysis, within the relevant epistemological environment, it is shown that their position is rich in philosophical assumptions and consequences, and the most problematic is the abolition of the autonomy of the intentional objectivity. Both the exclusion of philosophy and the unreflective "dealing" with her exposed Berger-Luckman's social constructionism to serious, in this paper raised objections., U ovom članku preispituje se temeljna teorijska odluka Bergera i Lukmana da pitanje socijalnog konstrukcionizma drže i razvijaju s one strane filosofije. Imanentnom tekstualnom analizom, unutar relevantnog epistemološkog okruženja, pokazuje se da je njihova postavka bogata i filosofskim pretpostavkama i konsekvencijama, a najproblematičnije je ukidanje smisaone samostalnosti intencionalne predmetnosti. I isključenje filosofije i nereflektovano "bavljenje" njome Berger-Lukmanov socijalni konstrukcionizam izlažu ozbiljnim, u ovom radu iznesenim prigovorima.", publisher = "Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd", journal = "Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU", title = "There is no need to push the bus. An analysis of Berger-Luckmann's philosophy without philosophy, Autobus ni ne treba gurati. Analiza Berger-Lukmanove filosofije bez filosofije", pages = "76-63", number = "1", volume = "67", doi = "10.2298/GEI1901063K" }
Koprivica, Č.,& Koprivica, Č.. (2019). There is no need to push the bus. An analysis of Berger-Luckmann's philosophy without philosophy. in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti SANU - Etnografski institut, Beograd., 67(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1901063K
Koprivica Č, Koprivica Č. There is no need to push the bus. An analysis of Berger-Luckmann's philosophy without philosophy. in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU. 2019;67(1):63-76. doi:10.2298/GEI1901063K .
Koprivica, Časlav, Koprivica, Časlav, "There is no need to push the bus. An analysis of Berger-Luckmann's philosophy without philosophy" in Glasnik Etnografskog instituta SANU, 67, no. 1 (2019):63-76, https://doi.org/10.2298/GEI1901063K . .