RFPN - Faculty of Political Science Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Political Science
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RFPN
  • FPN
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
  • View Item
  •   RFPN
  • FPN
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

An ostensible parliament or a political arena?

Prividni parlament ili politička arena?

Thumbnail
2019
745.pdf (132.0Kb)
Authors
Samardžić, Slobodan
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The main position of the article is that the last parliamentary election of the EU took place under the sign of politicization of significant pubic policies issues. Electoral campaign demonstrated the polarization of actors along the systemic/nonsystemic viewpoints line, i.e. programmes. The election outcomes show the fragmentation of the prosystemic party groups, as well as a relative strengthening of the nosystemic groups. Due to this fragmentation, it is expected that at least three party groups would be sufficient to achieving a decision, whereas for crucial decisions all four would be required. The Parliament has for the first time got majority and opposition; such clear division could dynamize its work. The author, however, considers that that EP has a principle problem with its own representation capacity; the permanent declination of the turnout is a significant indicator. The inclining turnout percentage at the last election (7%) is the consequence of the public scene polariza...tion process within the member states, as well as at the EU level. It will not change constitutionally weak position of the EP within the EU system of government; however, the new EP composition might be a medium of necessary public debate on the crisis exit path.

Zastupa se stav da su poslednji izbori za Evropski parlament prošli u znaku politizacije pitanja iz oblasti značajnih evropskih javnih politika. izborna kampanja pokazala je polarizaciju učesnika po liniji sistemska/nesistemska stanovišta, tj. programi. Po rezultatima izbora, došlo je do fragmentacije pro-sistemskih stranačkih grupacija i relativnog jačanja grupacija koje zahtevaju dublje promene sistema. Zbog te fragmentacije za očekivati je da će u pribavljanju većina za parlamentarne odluke biti potrebne tri, a za važnije odluke i sve četiri prosistemske grupacije. Parlament je prvi put dobio većinu i opoziciju, što će dinamizovati njegov rad. inače, autor smatra da EP ima načelan problem sa svojim predstavljačkim kapacitetom, o čemu svedoči stalno opadajući trend izlaznosti. na poslednjim izborima povećani procenat izlaznosti (7%) posledica je procesa politizacije javne scene u državama članicama i u Evropskoj uniji kao celini. To neće promeniti ustavno slab položaj Parlamenta u si...stemu vlasti, ali novi sastav EP može biti medijum potrebne javne debate o putevima izlaska iz krize.

Keywords:
European Parliament / politicization / polarization / system parties / antisystem parties / European Union / Evropski parlament / politizacija / polarizacija / sistemske stranke / nesistemske stranke / Evropska unija
Source:
Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 2019, 13, spec br, 13-28
Publisher:
  • Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd

ISSN: 1820-6700

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_748
URI
http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/748
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
Institution/Community
FPN
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Samardžić, Slobodan
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/748
AB  - The main position of the article is that the last parliamentary election of the EU took place under the sign of politicization of significant pubic policies issues. Electoral campaign demonstrated the polarization of actors along the systemic/nonsystemic viewpoints line, i.e. programmes. The election outcomes show the fragmentation of the prosystemic party groups, as well as a relative strengthening of the nosystemic groups. Due to this fragmentation, it is expected that at least three party groups would be sufficient to achieving a decision, whereas for crucial decisions all four would be required. The Parliament has for the first time got majority and opposition; such clear division could dynamize its work. The author, however, considers that that EP has a principle problem with its own representation capacity; the permanent declination of the turnout is a significant indicator. The inclining turnout percentage at the last election (7%) is the consequence of the public scene polarization process within the member states, as well as at the EU level. It will not change constitutionally weak position of the EP within the EU system of government; however, the new EP composition might be a medium of necessary public debate on the crisis exit path.
AB  - Zastupa se stav da su poslednji izbori za Evropski parlament prošli u znaku politizacije pitanja iz oblasti značajnih evropskih javnih politika. izborna kampanja pokazala je polarizaciju učesnika po liniji sistemska/nesistemska stanovišta, tj. programi. Po rezultatima izbora, došlo je do fragmentacije pro-sistemskih stranačkih grupacija i relativnog jačanja grupacija koje zahtevaju dublje promene sistema. Zbog te fragmentacije za očekivati je da će u pribavljanju većina za parlamentarne odluke biti potrebne tri, a za važnije odluke i sve četiri prosistemske grupacije. Parlament je prvi put dobio većinu i opoziciju, što će dinamizovati njegov rad. inače, autor smatra da EP ima načelan problem sa svojim predstavljačkim kapacitetom, o čemu svedoči stalno opadajući trend izlaznosti. na poslednjim izborima povećani procenat izlaznosti (7%) posledica je procesa politizacije javne scene u državama članicama i u Evropskoj uniji kao celini. To neće promeniti ustavno slab položaj Parlamenta u sistemu vlasti, ali novi sastav EP može biti medijum potrebne javne debate o putevima izlaska iz krize.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd
T2  - Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka
T1  - An ostensible parliament or a political arena?
T1  - Prividni parlament ili politička arena?
EP  - 28
IS  - spec br
SP  - 13
VL  - 13
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Samardžić, Slobodan",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The main position of the article is that the last parliamentary election of the EU took place under the sign of politicization of significant pubic policies issues. Electoral campaign demonstrated the polarization of actors along the systemic/nonsystemic viewpoints line, i.e. programmes. The election outcomes show the fragmentation of the prosystemic party groups, as well as a relative strengthening of the nosystemic groups. Due to this fragmentation, it is expected that at least three party groups would be sufficient to achieving a decision, whereas for crucial decisions all four would be required. The Parliament has for the first time got majority and opposition; such clear division could dynamize its work. The author, however, considers that that EP has a principle problem with its own representation capacity; the permanent declination of the turnout is a significant indicator. The inclining turnout percentage at the last election (7%) is the consequence of the public scene polarization process within the member states, as well as at the EU level. It will not change constitutionally weak position of the EP within the EU system of government; however, the new EP composition might be a medium of necessary public debate on the crisis exit path., Zastupa se stav da su poslednji izbori za Evropski parlament prošli u znaku politizacije pitanja iz oblasti značajnih evropskih javnih politika. izborna kampanja pokazala je polarizaciju učesnika po liniji sistemska/nesistemska stanovišta, tj. programi. Po rezultatima izbora, došlo je do fragmentacije pro-sistemskih stranačkih grupacija i relativnog jačanja grupacija koje zahtevaju dublje promene sistema. Zbog te fragmentacije za očekivati je da će u pribavljanju većina za parlamentarne odluke biti potrebne tri, a za važnije odluke i sve četiri prosistemske grupacije. Parlament je prvi put dobio većinu i opoziciju, što će dinamizovati njegov rad. inače, autor smatra da EP ima načelan problem sa svojim predstavljačkim kapacitetom, o čemu svedoči stalno opadajući trend izlaznosti. na poslednjim izborima povećani procenat izlaznosti (7%) posledica je procesa politizacije javne scene u državama članicama i u Evropskoj uniji kao celini. To neće promeniti ustavno slab položaj Parlamenta u sistemu vlasti, ali novi sastav EP može biti medijum potrebne javne debate o putevima izlaska iz krize.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd",
journal = "Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka",
title = "An ostensible parliament or a political arena?, Prividni parlament ili politička arena?",
pages = "28-13",
number = "spec br",
volume = "13"
}
Samardžić, S.. (2019). An ostensible parliament or a political arena?. in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd., 13(spec br), 13-28.
Samardžić S. An ostensible parliament or a political arena?. in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka. 2019;13(spec br):13-28..
Samardžić, Slobodan, "An ostensible parliament or a political arena?" in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 13, no. spec br (2019):13-28.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RFPN | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RFPN | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB