RFPN - Faculty of Political Science Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Political Science
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RFPN
  • FPN
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
  • View Item
  •   RFPN
  • FPN
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Does scholarly literature on the breakup of Yugoslavia travel well?

Authorized Users Only
2014
Authors
Vladisavljević, Nebojša
Book part (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The scholarly study of the breakup of Yugoslavia has advanced considerably in the past two decades. Research from the 1990s set a solid foundation for future attempts at explanation by offering a comprehensive overview of the causes and dynamics of the breakup and its implications, not least because it relied on a wide range of primary and secondary sources. Studies that followed built upon this foundation by narrowing down their research focus to specific dimensions of the breakup and by delving into a systematic exploration of primary sources. As a result, novel interpretations that were firmly based on empirical research started putting together a rather complex story of Yugoslavia’s breakup. However, a weak conceptual and theoretical foundation of much of the scholarly work, as well as a tendency to see this case as unique or exceptional, has held back empirical research in our field. The greater theoretical focus and insights from the literatures on political regimes and regime ch...ange, nationalist mobilization, national and ethnic conflict regulation, civil wars and other relevant perspectives may suggest important ways to improve empirical research in our field.

Keywords:
Yugoslavia / state breakup / comparative research
Source:
Debating the end of Yugoslavia, 2014, 67-79
Publisher:
  • Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, : Abingdon

ISBN: 978-1409467113

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_946
URI
http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/946
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
Institution/Community
FPN
TY  - CHAP
AU  - Vladisavljević, Nebojša
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/946
AB  - The scholarly study of the breakup of Yugoslavia has advanced considerably in the past two decades. Research from the 1990s set a solid foundation for future attempts at explanation by offering a comprehensive overview of the causes and dynamics of the breakup and its implications, not least because it relied on a wide range of primary and secondary sources. Studies that followed built upon this foundation by narrowing down their research focus to specific dimensions of the breakup and by delving into a systematic exploration of primary sources. As a result, novel interpretations that were firmly based on empirical research started putting together a rather complex story of Yugoslavia’s breakup. However, a weak conceptual and theoretical foundation of much of the scholarly work, as well as a tendency to see this case as unique or exceptional, has held back empirical research in our field. The greater theoretical focus and insights from the literatures on political regimes and regime change, nationalist mobilization, national and ethnic conflict regulation, civil wars and other relevant perspectives may suggest important ways to improve empirical research in our field.
PB  - Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, : Abingdon
T2  - Debating the end of Yugoslavia
T1  - Does scholarly literature on the breakup of Yugoslavia travel well?
EP  - 79
SP  - 67
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Vladisavljević, Nebojša",
year = "2014",
abstract = "The scholarly study of the breakup of Yugoslavia has advanced considerably in the past two decades. Research from the 1990s set a solid foundation for future attempts at explanation by offering a comprehensive overview of the causes and dynamics of the breakup and its implications, not least because it relied on a wide range of primary and secondary sources. Studies that followed built upon this foundation by narrowing down their research focus to specific dimensions of the breakup and by delving into a systematic exploration of primary sources. As a result, novel interpretations that were firmly based on empirical research started putting together a rather complex story of Yugoslavia’s breakup. However, a weak conceptual and theoretical foundation of much of the scholarly work, as well as a tendency to see this case as unique or exceptional, has held back empirical research in our field. The greater theoretical focus and insights from the literatures on political regimes and regime change, nationalist mobilization, national and ethnic conflict regulation, civil wars and other relevant perspectives may suggest important ways to improve empirical research in our field.",
publisher = "Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, : Abingdon",
journal = "Debating the end of Yugoslavia",
booktitle = "Does scholarly literature on the breakup of Yugoslavia travel well?",
pages = "79-67"
}
Vladisavljević, N.. (2014). Does scholarly literature on the breakup of Yugoslavia travel well?. in Debating the end of Yugoslavia
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, : Abingdon., 67-79.
Vladisavljević N. Does scholarly literature on the breakup of Yugoslavia travel well?. in Debating the end of Yugoslavia. 2014;:67-79..
Vladisavljević, Nebojša, "Does scholarly literature on the breakup of Yugoslavia travel well?" in Debating the end of Yugoslavia (2014):67-79.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RFPN | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RFPN | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB