RFPN - Faculty of Political Science Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Political Science
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RFPN
  • FPN
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
  • View Item
  •   RFPN
  • FPN
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Sistemi sa neposredno izabranim predsednikom, nasleđe starog režima i novi ustav

Thumbnail
2003
fulltext.pdf (87.67Kb)
Authors
Vladisavljević, Nebojša
Other (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The paper discusses merits and drawbacks of various systems with a directly elected president, including premier-presidential system (semi-presidentialism) that was introduced in Serbia in 1990. It argues that this system is more conducive to democratic consolidation than parliamentarism in those post-communist states fractured by deep political divisions. Serbia did not enjoy advantages of premier-presidentialism, in contrast to France, Finland, Portugal or Poland, because this system operated under authoritarian rule in the 1990s and then under democratising, but nonetheless hybrid regime after the fall of Milošević (Milosevic) in October 2000, that is, under conditions that strengthened the executive and prevented the rise of powerful checks on its power, such as strong legislature, judiciary and various agencies of horizontal accountability. Therefore, efforts of pro-democracy activists should not be directed to the introduction of parliamentary system, but to the removal of instit...utional legacy of the old regime which prevents Serbia from attaining minimal democratic standards and from consolidating its institutions

Keywords:
semipresidentialism / Serbia / democracy / democratization
Source:
Призма, 2003, 9-18
Publisher:
  • CLDS : Beograd
[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_952
URI
http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/952
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
Institution/Community
FPN
TY  - GEN
AU  - Vladisavljević, Nebojša
PY  - 2003
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/952
AB  - The paper discusses merits and drawbacks of various systems with a directly elected president, including premier-presidential system (semi-presidentialism) that was introduced in Serbia in 1990. It argues that this system is more conducive to democratic consolidation than parliamentarism in those post-communist states fractured by deep political divisions. Serbia did not enjoy advantages of premier-presidentialism, in contrast to France, Finland, Portugal or Poland, because this system operated under authoritarian rule in the 1990s and then under democratising, but nonetheless hybrid regime after the fall of Milošević (Milosevic) in October 2000, that is, under conditions that strengthened the executive and prevented the rise of powerful checks on its power, such as strong legislature, judiciary and various agencies of horizontal accountability. Therefore, efforts of pro-democracy activists should not be directed to the introduction of parliamentary system, but to the removal of institutional legacy of the old regime which prevents Serbia from attaining minimal democratic standards and from consolidating its institutions
PB  - CLDS : Beograd
T2  - Призма
T1  - Sistemi sa neposredno izabranim predsednikom, nasleđe starog režima i novi ustav
EP  - 18
SP  - 9
ER  - 
@misc{
author = "Vladisavljević, Nebojša",
year = "2003",
abstract = "The paper discusses merits and drawbacks of various systems with a directly elected president, including premier-presidential system (semi-presidentialism) that was introduced in Serbia in 1990. It argues that this system is more conducive to democratic consolidation than parliamentarism in those post-communist states fractured by deep political divisions. Serbia did not enjoy advantages of premier-presidentialism, in contrast to France, Finland, Portugal or Poland, because this system operated under authoritarian rule in the 1990s and then under democratising, but nonetheless hybrid regime after the fall of Milošević (Milosevic) in October 2000, that is, under conditions that strengthened the executive and prevented the rise of powerful checks on its power, such as strong legislature, judiciary and various agencies of horizontal accountability. Therefore, efforts of pro-democracy activists should not be directed to the introduction of parliamentary system, but to the removal of institutional legacy of the old regime which prevents Serbia from attaining minimal democratic standards and from consolidating its institutions",
publisher = "CLDS : Beograd",
journal = "Призма",
title = "Sistemi sa neposredno izabranim predsednikom, nasleđe starog režima i novi ustav",
pages = "18-9"
}
Vladisavljević, N.. (2003). Sistemi sa neposredno izabranim predsednikom, nasleđe starog režima i novi ustav. in Призма
CLDS : Beograd., 9-18.
Vladisavljević N. Sistemi sa neposredno izabranim predsednikom, nasleđe starog režima i novi ustav. in Призма. 2003;:9-18..
Vladisavljević, Nebojša, "Sistemi sa neposredno izabranim predsednikom, nasleđe starog režima i novi ustav" in Призма (2003):9-18.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RFPN | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RFPN | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB