RFPN - Faculty of Political Science Repository
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Political Science
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RFPN
  • FPN
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
  • View Item
  •   RFPN
  • FPN
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Geopolitical Position of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization within the Belt and Road Initiative

Thumbnail
2020
fulltext.pdf (303.9Kb)
Authors
Popović, Slobodan
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This paper will analyze the geopolitical position of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) within the controversial, pretentious, and grandiose Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The paper shall be made of three parts. The first part will tackle geopolitical schools that exist amongst Chinese academia and policymakers. Our attention will be focused on the debate on the geopolitical thoughts which occurred after publishing China`s first military strategy in 2015. The second part of the paper will tackle the institutional development of the SCO. This Organization stems from the Shanghai Five mechanism which China initiated in 1996 and which was supported by Russia, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan, by Uzbekistan in 2001 and by India and Pakistan in 2017, respectively. By analyzing the institutional development of the SCO, readers will be able to understand how the SCO fits or, even, reinforce Chinese geopolitical ambitions. The third part of the paper will explain the role of ...the SCO in the Silk Road Economic Belt, that is, in the part of space that Mackinder defined as Heartland. At the same time, we cannot ignore the upcoming role of the SCO in Chinese maritime geopolitical ambitions, that is, in the space of Asia-Pacific and Indo-Pacific. Still, different historical backgrounds, individual interpretation of security interests, asymmetric levels of development amongst member states of the SCO are factors that produce political and economic mistrust within the SCO. Additionally, economic and trade globalization enhances two parallel trends. On one side, it enhances the flow of goods, people, services, and capital, and on the other side, it reinforces the vulnerability of borders and the flow of terrorists. Those challenges require pragmatic, flexible, and bold approaches which should be based on respecting the interests of the SCO member states and the guiding principles of the SCO.

Keywords:
Belt and Road Initiative / Shanghai Cooperation Organization / Geopolitics / Asia-Pacific / Indo-Pacific / New Security Concept
Source:
Asian Issues, 2020, 6, 1, 73-91
Publisher:
  • Institute for Asian Studies : Beograd

ISSN: 2217-8813

[ Google Scholar ]
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_960
URI
http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/960
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers' papers
Institution/Community
FPN
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Slobodan
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/960
AB  - This paper will analyze the geopolitical position of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) within the controversial, pretentious, and grandiose Chinese Belt and Road
Initiative (BRI). The paper shall be made of three parts. The first part will tackle geopolitical
schools that exist amongst Chinese academia and policymakers. Our attention will be focused on the debate on the geopolitical thoughts which occurred after publishing China`s
first military strategy in 2015. The second part of the paper will tackle the institutional development of the SCO. This Organization stems from the Shanghai Five mechanism which
China initiated in 1996 and which was supported by Russia, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan,
by Uzbekistan in 2001 and by India and Pakistan in 2017, respectively. By analyzing the
institutional development of the SCO, readers will be able to understand how the SCO
fits or, even, reinforce Chinese geopolitical ambitions. The third part of the paper will explain the role of the SCO in the Silk Road Economic Belt, that is, in the part of space that
Mackinder defined as Heartland. At the same time, we cannot ignore the upcoming role
of the SCO in Chinese maritime geopolitical ambitions, that is, in the space of Asia-Pacific
and Indo-Pacific. Still, different historical backgrounds, individual interpretation of security
interests, asymmetric levels of development amongst member states of the SCO are factors
that produce political and economic mistrust within the SCO. Additionally, economic and
trade globalization enhances two parallel trends. On one side, it enhances the flow of
goods, people, services, and capital, and on the other side, it reinforces the vulnerability
of borders and the flow of terrorists. Those challenges require pragmatic, flexible, and bold
approaches which should be based on respecting the interests of the SCO member states
and the guiding principles of the SCO.
PB  - Institute for Asian Studies : Beograd
T2  - Asian Issues
T1  - Geopolitical Position of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization within the Belt and Road Initiative
EP  - 91
IS  - 1
SP  - 73
VL  - 6
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Popović, Slobodan",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This paper will analyze the geopolitical position of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) within the controversial, pretentious, and grandiose Chinese Belt and Road
Initiative (BRI). The paper shall be made of three parts. The first part will tackle geopolitical
schools that exist amongst Chinese academia and policymakers. Our attention will be focused on the debate on the geopolitical thoughts which occurred after publishing China`s
first military strategy in 2015. The second part of the paper will tackle the institutional development of the SCO. This Organization stems from the Shanghai Five mechanism which
China initiated in 1996 and which was supported by Russia, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan,
by Uzbekistan in 2001 and by India and Pakistan in 2017, respectively. By analyzing the
institutional development of the SCO, readers will be able to understand how the SCO
fits or, even, reinforce Chinese geopolitical ambitions. The third part of the paper will explain the role of the SCO in the Silk Road Economic Belt, that is, in the part of space that
Mackinder defined as Heartland. At the same time, we cannot ignore the upcoming role
of the SCO in Chinese maritime geopolitical ambitions, that is, in the space of Asia-Pacific
and Indo-Pacific. Still, different historical backgrounds, individual interpretation of security
interests, asymmetric levels of development amongst member states of the SCO are factors
that produce political and economic mistrust within the SCO. Additionally, economic and
trade globalization enhances two parallel trends. On one side, it enhances the flow of
goods, people, services, and capital, and on the other side, it reinforces the vulnerability
of borders and the flow of terrorists. Those challenges require pragmatic, flexible, and bold
approaches which should be based on respecting the interests of the SCO member states
and the guiding principles of the SCO.",
publisher = "Institute for Asian Studies : Beograd",
journal = "Asian Issues",
title = "Geopolitical Position of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization within the Belt and Road Initiative",
pages = "91-73",
number = "1",
volume = "6"
}
Popović, S.. (2020). Geopolitical Position of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization within the Belt and Road Initiative. in Asian Issues
Institute for Asian Studies : Beograd., 6(1), 73-91.
Popović S. Geopolitical Position of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization within the Belt and Road Initiative. in Asian Issues. 2020;6(1):73-91..
Popović, Slobodan, "Geopolitical Position of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization within the Belt and Road Initiative" in Asian Issues, 6, no. 1 (2020):73-91.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RFPN | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RFPN | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB