@inbook{
author = "Kinđić, Zoran",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Problem
porekla
dobra i zla još od rane mladosti
bio je predmet
Ničeovog
interesovanja.
Za razliku
od onih koji moralne
norme
prihvataju
kao date i univerzalne,
koji veruju
u večne
natčulne
vrednosti,
Niče se nije ustručavao
da moral podvrgne
bespoštednoj
kritici.
On ističe
da ne postoji
moral kao takav, već različiti
morali,
koji su se uspostavljali
tokom istorije
shodno
potrebama
određenih
zajednica
da se
održe
i napreduju.
Кada kritikuje
moral kao protivprirodan,
kao nihilistički,
Niče
u vidu ima tradicionalni
evropski
moral, koji ima hrišćansko
poreklo.
Da bi diskreditovao
taj moral „stada“,
on ga s jedne
strane
poredi
sa aristokratskim
antičkim
moralom
gospodara,
a s druge
strane
genealoškim
metodom
pokušava
da pokaže
njegovo
nisko, nemoralno
poreklo.
Niče razlikuje
tri perioda
čovečanstva:
predmoralni,
moralni
i imoralni.
Dok je u predmoralnom
periodu
naglasak
bio na posledicama
nekog
postupka,
u moralnom
periodu
poreklo
postupka
izvodi
se iz namere
moralnog
subjekta.
Niče očekuje
da će se samoprevazilaženjem
moral transformisati
u imoralizam,
poziciju
s onu stranu
dobra i zla. Iako se slaže
sa Ničeom
da moralno
stanovište
nije najviše,
da ono podrazumeva
potiskivanje
nagonske
energije,
autor za razliku
od nemačkog
mislioca,
koji se opredeljuje
za imoralističko
slavljenja
života
i nesputano
ispoljavanje
volje za moć, alternativu
vidi u duhovnom
preobražaju
te energije.
Razlog
što Niče
hrišćanstvo
i hrišćanski
moral doživljava
kao proizvod
ljudi slabe
volje, slabog
ja,
autor vidi s jedne
strane
u Ničeovom
naglašenom
egocentrizmu,
a s druge
strane
u tome
što nije imao iskustvo
susreta
sa istinskim
hrišćanstvom.
Da je upoznao
svetitelje,
shvatio
bi da natprirodno
nije puka iluzija,
da je duhovna
sfera
zaista
iznad prirodne., Problem of the origin of good and evil had been the subject of Nietzsche’s interest since
his early youth. Unlike those who accept moral norms as given and universal, who believe in
eternal, supersensible, Nietzsche did not hesitate to submit the morality to a merciless criticism.
He emphasizes that the morality does not exist as such, but that there are different moralities that
were established throughout history, according to the needs of certain communities to sustain
and thrive. When criticizing morality as unnatural, as nihilistic, Nietzsche has in mind the traditional
European morality that has the Christian origin. In order to discredit the “herd” morality,
on the one hand, he compares it with an aristocratic ancient morality of the master, and, on
the other hand, by using a genealogical method, he tries to present its low, immoral origin. Nietzsche
distinguishes between three stages of humanity: pre-moral, moral, and immoral. In the
pre-moral period, the emphasis was placed on the consequences of a certain action, whereas in
the moral period, the origin of an action is derived from the intention of the moral subject. Nietzsche
expects that by self-overcoming, the morality will transform itself to immoralism, a position
beyond good and evil. The author agrees with Nietzsche in that the moral standpoint is not
the highest one, that it implies repressing the instinctual energy. However, unlike the German
thinker, who chooses immoralistic celebration of life and unrestrained manifestation of will to
power, the author sees the alternative in the spiritual transformation of that energy. Why does
Nietzsche experience Christianity and Christian morality as a product of persons of a weak will,
a weak self? The author sees the reason, on the one hand, in Nietzsche’s enhanced egocentricity,
and, on the other hand, in that he lacked the experience of meeting the true Christianity. Had he
met the sacred persons, he would have understood that the supernatural is not a mere illusion,
that the spiritual realm is, indeed, above the natural.",
publisher = "Gnomon Centar za humanistiku : Beograd, Matica Srpska : Podgorica",
journal = "Philosophоs – Philotheos – Philoponоs : Studies and Essays as Charisteria in Honor of Professor Bogoljub Šijaković on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday",
booktitle = "Ničeova kritika morala, Nietzsches’s Criticism of Morality",
pages = "514-489",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_983"
}
