TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kovačević, Marko
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1249
AB  - Cilj ovog rada je da omogući temeljan uvid u ključne teorijske rasprave u vezi sa odnosom identiteta i uloga u disciplini međunarodnih odnosa i analizi spoljne politike, s posebnim fokusom na teorijske pristupe socijalnog konstruktivizma i teorije spoljnopolitičkih uloga. Imajući u vidu odsustvo interesovanja za ovaj pristup istraživanju u regionalnoj akademskoj literaturi, sistematizujem tri dimenzije proučavanja uloga u spoljnoj i bezbednosnoj politici: ontološku, epistemološku i metodološku. U ovom nastojanju da se prokrči put daljim istraživanjima, poseban naglasak se stavlja na uloge malih država u svetskoj politici između strukturnih imperativa i mogućnosti delatništva. Teorija uloga se sagledava u svom odnosu prema konsturktivističkoj analizi spoljne politike, pri čemu se ukazuje na osnovne pojmove teorije uloga, interpretativnu metodologiju i neke primere istraživanja diskurzivnog konstruisanja identiteta i uloga država. U zaključku se osvrćem na neka dalja pitanja i jednu istraživačku agendu identiteta i uloga u međunarodnim odnosima.
AB  - The aim of this article is to enable a comprehensive insight into key theoretical debates on the relationship between identities and roles in International Relations (IR) and Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA), with a particular focus on
theoretical approaches of social constructivism and foreign policy role theory.
Given the lack of interest in this research approach the post-Yugoslav IR literature, I systematize ontological, epistemological and methodological dimensions of studying foreign policy and security roles of states. In this research
path-breaking effort, a special emphasis is on the role of small states in world
politics between structural imperatives and possibilities of agency. Role the-
ory is reviewed in its relationship toward constructivist FPA, whereas the key
notions of role theory, interpretive methodology and some examples of re -
search on discursive construction of state identity and roles are presented. In
the conclusion, I reflect on some further questions and a research agenda of
identity and roles in IR.
PB  - Zagreb : Fakultet političkih znanosti
PB  - Beograd : Fakultet političkih nauka
T2  - Političke perspektive: časopis za istraživanje politike
T1  - Odnos identiteta i uloga u međunarodnim odnosima i spoljnoj politici: ontologija, epistemologija i metodologija
T1  - Identity-Role Relationship in Intetrnational Relations and Foreign Policy: Ontology, Epistemology and Methodology
EP  - 86
IS  - 2
SP  - 57
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.20901/pp.13.2.02
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kovačević, Marko",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Cilj ovog rada je da omogući temeljan uvid u ključne teorijske rasprave u vezi sa odnosom identiteta i uloga u disciplini međunarodnih odnosa i analizi spoljne politike, s posebnim fokusom na teorijske pristupe socijalnog konstruktivizma i teorije spoljnopolitičkih uloga. Imajući u vidu odsustvo interesovanja za ovaj pristup istraživanju u regionalnoj akademskoj literaturi, sistematizujem tri dimenzije proučavanja uloga u spoljnoj i bezbednosnoj politici: ontološku, epistemološku i metodološku. U ovom nastojanju da se prokrči put daljim istraživanjima, poseban naglasak se stavlja na uloge malih država u svetskoj politici između strukturnih imperativa i mogućnosti delatništva. Teorija uloga se sagledava u svom odnosu prema konsturktivističkoj analizi spoljne politike, pri čemu se ukazuje na osnovne pojmove teorije uloga, interpretativnu metodologiju i neke primere istraživanja diskurzivnog konstruisanja identiteta i uloga država. U zaključku se osvrćem na neka dalja pitanja i jednu istraživačku agendu identiteta i uloga u međunarodnim odnosima., The aim of this article is to enable a comprehensive insight into key theoretical debates on the relationship between identities and roles in International Relations (IR) and Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA), with a particular focus on
theoretical approaches of social constructivism and foreign policy role theory.
Given the lack of interest in this research approach the post-Yugoslav IR literature, I systematize ontological, epistemological and methodological dimensions of studying foreign policy and security roles of states. In this research
path-breaking effort, a special emphasis is on the role of small states in world
politics between structural imperatives and possibilities of agency. Role the-
ory is reviewed in its relationship toward constructivist FPA, whereas the key
notions of role theory, interpretive methodology and some examples of re -
search on discursive construction of state identity and roles are presented. In
the conclusion, I reflect on some further questions and a research agenda of
identity and roles in IR.",
publisher = "Zagreb : Fakultet političkih znanosti, Beograd : Fakultet političkih nauka",
journal = "Političke perspektive: časopis za istraživanje politike",
title = "Odnos identiteta i uloga u međunarodnim odnosima i spoljnoj politici: ontologija, epistemologija i metodologija, Identity-Role Relationship in Intetrnational Relations and Foreign Policy: Ontology, Epistemology and Methodology",
pages = "86-57",
number = "2",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.20901/pp.13.2.02"
}

Kovačević, M.. (2023). Odnos identiteta i uloga u međunarodnim odnosima i spoljnoj politici: ontologija, epistemologija i metodologija. in Političke perspektive: časopis za istraživanje politike
Zagreb : Fakultet političkih znanosti., 13(2), 57-86.
https://doi.org/10.20901/pp.13.2.02

Kovačević M. Odnos identiteta i uloga u međunarodnim odnosima i spoljnoj politici: ontologija, epistemologija i metodologija. in Političke perspektive: časopis za istraživanje politike. 2023;13(2):57-86.
doi:10.20901/pp.13.2.02 .

Kovačević, Marko, "Odnos identiteta i uloga u međunarodnim odnosima i spoljnoj politici: ontologija, epistemologija i metodologija" in Političke perspektive: časopis za istraživanje politike, 13, no. 2 (2023):57-86,
https://doi.org/10.20901/pp.13.2.02 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kovačević, Marko
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/939
AB  - Tokom trideset godina nakon raspada socijalističke Jugoslavije, Srbija i Hrvatska su
kao postjugoslovenske male države ipak drugačije osmišljavale svoje mesto u regio-
nalnom i globalnom kontekstu. O tome svedoči i njihov različit odnos prema među-
narodnim organizacijama poput Evropske unije (EU), NATO ili Ujedinjenih nacija.
Ovaj članak u središte svog interesovanja uzima UN kao multilateralni forum ili
arenu u kojoj se bitno predstavljaju i oblikuju spoljnopolitičke uloge i identiteti
malih država. Oslanjajući se na konstruktivističku analizu spoljne politike i teoriju
uloga, autor se fokusirao na glavne deonice u razvoju spoljnopolitičkih narativa Sr-
bije i Hrvatske kao aktivnih malih država članica u Ujedinjenim nacijama. Iako obe
države vide sebe kao aktivne, ta aktivnost bi trebalo da bude u funkciji dve različite,
teorijski profilisane, strategije malih država. Obrazlaže se sledeći argument: dok
Srbija zbog složenosti kosovskog pitanja vodi uglavnom defanzivno autonomnu
strategiju u skladu sa proklamovanom vojnom neutralnošću, dotle je Hrvatska
kao mala članica EU i NATO priklonjena traganju za integracionističkim uticajem
u konstelaciji sa evroatlantskim partnerima. Analizom zvaničnih diskursa dveju ze-
malja u Generalnoj skupštini UN, između 2000. i 2020. godine, pokazano je na koji
način, i u kojoj meri se njihovi diskursi o regionalnoj, evropskoj i svetskoj politici
približavaju ili udaljavaju, i razmatra se šta to znači za njihova mesta u svetu.
AB  - In 30 years after the breakup of the socialist Yugoslavia, Serbia and
Croatia as small states differently envisaged their place in regional
and global context. Such difference is demonstrated by their diffe-
rent relationships toward international organizations such as the
European Union, NATO or the United Nations. This article, as its
central interest takes the United Nations as a multilateral forum or
an arena where small states importantly represent and shape their
foreign policy identities and roles. Relying on the constructivist
foreign policy analysis and role theory, I focused on the key stages in
the development of Serbia's and Croatia's foreign policy narratives as
active member states of the United Nations. Although both of these
post-Yugoslav states perceive themselves as active, such activity
belongs to two different, theoretically conceptualized strategies of
small states. I argue that Serbia, due to the complexity of Kosovo pro-
blem mostly leads defensive autonomous strategy that is bounded by
its proclaimed military neutrality, whereas Croatia being a small EU
and NATO member is closer to integrationist influence seeking under
the same constellation with its Euro-Atlantic partners. By analyzing
the official diplomatic discourses of both states at the UN General
Assembly between 2000 and 2020, I show how and to what degree
their discourses on regional, European and global politics converge
or diverge, and discuss what that means for their respective places in
the world.
PB  - Zagreb : Srpsko narodno vijeće
PB  - Zagreb : Arhiv Srba u Hrvatskoj
T2  - Tragovi : časopis za srpske i hrvatske teme
T1  - Diskurzivni tragovi malih država: oblikovanje identiteta i uloga Srbije i Hrvatske u Ujedinjenim nacijama
T1  - Discursive traces of small states: shaping of Serbia's and Croatia's identities and roles at the United Nations
EP  - 107
IS  - 1
SP  - 73
VL  - 5
DO  - 10.52328/t.5.1.3.
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kovačević, Marko",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Tokom trideset godina nakon raspada socijalističke Jugoslavije, Srbija i Hrvatska su
kao postjugoslovenske male države ipak drugačije osmišljavale svoje mesto u regio-
nalnom i globalnom kontekstu. O tome svedoči i njihov različit odnos prema među-
narodnim organizacijama poput Evropske unije (EU), NATO ili Ujedinjenih nacija.
Ovaj članak u središte svog interesovanja uzima UN kao multilateralni forum ili
arenu u kojoj se bitno predstavljaju i oblikuju spoljnopolitičke uloge i identiteti
malih država. Oslanjajući se na konstruktivističku analizu spoljne politike i teoriju
uloga, autor se fokusirao na glavne deonice u razvoju spoljnopolitičkih narativa Sr-
bije i Hrvatske kao aktivnih malih država članica u Ujedinjenim nacijama. Iako obe
države vide sebe kao aktivne, ta aktivnost bi trebalo da bude u funkciji dve različite,
teorijski profilisane, strategije malih država. Obrazlaže se sledeći argument: dok
Srbija zbog složenosti kosovskog pitanja vodi uglavnom defanzivno autonomnu
strategiju u skladu sa proklamovanom vojnom neutralnošću, dotle je Hrvatska
kao mala članica EU i NATO priklonjena traganju za integracionističkim uticajem
u konstelaciji sa evroatlantskim partnerima. Analizom zvaničnih diskursa dveju ze-
malja u Generalnoj skupštini UN, između 2000. i 2020. godine, pokazano je na koji
način, i u kojoj meri se njihovi diskursi o regionalnoj, evropskoj i svetskoj politici
približavaju ili udaljavaju, i razmatra se šta to znači za njihova mesta u svetu., In 30 years after the breakup of the socialist Yugoslavia, Serbia and
Croatia as small states differently envisaged their place in regional
and global context. Such difference is demonstrated by their diffe-
rent relationships toward international organizations such as the
European Union, NATO or the United Nations. This article, as its
central interest takes the United Nations as a multilateral forum or
an arena where small states importantly represent and shape their
foreign policy identities and roles. Relying on the constructivist
foreign policy analysis and role theory, I focused on the key stages in
the development of Serbia's and Croatia's foreign policy narratives as
active member states of the United Nations. Although both of these
post-Yugoslav states perceive themselves as active, such activity
belongs to two different, theoretically conceptualized strategies of
small states. I argue that Serbia, due to the complexity of Kosovo pro-
blem mostly leads defensive autonomous strategy that is bounded by
its proclaimed military neutrality, whereas Croatia being a small EU
and NATO member is closer to integrationist influence seeking under
the same constellation with its Euro-Atlantic partners. By analyzing
the official diplomatic discourses of both states at the UN General
Assembly between 2000 and 2020, I show how and to what degree
their discourses on regional, European and global politics converge
or diverge, and discuss what that means for their respective places in
the world.",
publisher = "Zagreb : Srpsko narodno vijeće, Zagreb : Arhiv Srba u Hrvatskoj",
journal = "Tragovi : časopis za srpske i hrvatske teme",
title = "Diskurzivni tragovi malih država: oblikovanje identiteta i uloga Srbije i Hrvatske u Ujedinjenim nacijama, Discursive traces of small states: shaping of Serbia's and Croatia's identities and roles at the United Nations",
pages = "107-73",
number = "1",
volume = "5",
doi = "10.52328/t.5.1.3."
}

Kovačević, M.. (2022). Diskurzivni tragovi malih država: oblikovanje identiteta i uloga Srbije i Hrvatske u Ujedinjenim nacijama. in Tragovi : časopis za srpske i hrvatske teme
Zagreb : Srpsko narodno vijeće., 5(1), 73-107.
https://doi.org/10.52328/t.5.1.3.

Kovačević M. Diskurzivni tragovi malih država: oblikovanje identiteta i uloga Srbije i Hrvatske u Ujedinjenim nacijama. in Tragovi : časopis za srpske i hrvatske teme. 2022;5(1):73-107.
doi:10.52328/t.5.1.3. .

Kovačević, Marko, "Diskurzivni tragovi malih država: oblikovanje identiteta i uloga Srbije i Hrvatske u Ujedinjenim nacijama" in Tragovi : časopis za srpske i hrvatske teme, 5, no. 1 (2022):73-107,
https://doi.org/10.52328/t.5.1.3. . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Cvetić, Andrej
AU  - Kovačević, Marko
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1247
AB  - U ovom radu obrazložićemo stav da je teorija regionalnog
bezbednosnog kompleksa (TRBK) (Buzan and Waever 2003), najadekvatnije
pozicionirana među različitim „regionalističkim“ pristupima u
međunarodnim odnosima, bilo u pogledu izgradnje teorije bilo u
empirijskim istraživanjima o regionalnoj bezbednosti. Ciljevi ovog rada su
trostruki: a) da predstavi TRBK u savremenom proučavanju regionalne
bezbednosti; b) da mapira studije regionalne bezbednosti i sagleda odnos
TRBK sa drugim (srodnim/rivalskim) teorijama; c) da oceni karakter
sagledanog odnosa TRBK i drugih teorija regionalne bezbednosti. Tako
postavljenim ciljevima odgovaraju tri metodološka koraka. Prvo, pregledom
literature želimo ukazati na teorijsku evoluciju i empirijsku primenu TRBK
tokom prethodne dve decenije. Drugo, ponudićemo pregled i klasifikaciju
relevantnih koncepata drugih „regionalističkih“ teorija za koje smatramo da
„rezonuju“ sa okvirom TRBK. Treće, odgovorićemo na pitanje da li je i u
kojoj meri je TRBK kompatibilna sa konceptima užih, rivalskih pristupa.
Smatramo da TRBK može poslužiti kao svojevrstan „interfejs“ širih studija regionalne bezbednosti. Kako bismo ilustrovali predloženi postupak, u
trećem odeljku rada se raspravlja o prednostima koje TRBK kao teorija
srednjeg obima ima u odnosu na rivalske pristupe koji se usredsređuju na
regionalne poretke (Katzenstein 2005; Frazier and Stewart-Ingersoll 2010),
regionalne bezbednosne zajednice (Adler and Barnett 1998), ili regionalni
„multipleks“ međunarodni poredak (Acharya 2014; Acharya 2018).
Zaključak upućuje na mogućnosti hibridizacije TRBK i srodnih/rivalskih
teorijskih pristupa, što otvara značajna pitanja za dalji razvoj istraživačkog
programa studija regionalne bezbednosti u trećoj deceniji XXI veka.
AB  - In this paper, we argue that the Regional Security Complex
Theory (RSCT) (Buzan and Waever 2003) is most adequately positioned
among various “regionalist” approaches in International Relations, both
for theory-building and empirical research on regional security. The aims
of the paper are threefold: a) to review the RSCT within contemporary
International Security Studies; b) to map out regional security studies and
reflect on the relationship between the RSCT and other (related/rival)
theories; c) to assess the character of the relationship between the RSCT
and other theories. The aforesaid aims are achieved in three steps. First,
by doing a literature review, we want to point out the theoretical
evolution and empirical application of the RSCT over the past two
decades. Second, we offer a review and classification of relevant concepts
from other “regionalist” theories which we consider to “resonate” with
the RSCT framework. Third, we answer the question of whether and to
what degree the RSCT is compatible with the concepts of the narrower,
rival approaches. We argue the RSCT can be used as a sort of “interface”
of wider regional security studies. In order to illustrate our research
framework, the third part of the paper deals with and discusses the
advantages that the RSCT, as a medium-range theory, has in comparison
with the rival approaches that are concerned with regional orders
(Katzenstein 2005; Frazier and Stewart-Ingersoll 2010), regional security
communities (Adler and Barnett 1998), or regional “multiplex” order
(Acharya 2014; Acharya 2018). In conclusion, the paper addresses the
possibilities for hybridization between the RSCT and related/rival
approaches, which have opened some important questions for further
development of the research programme of regional security studies in
the 2020s
PB  - Beograd : Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu
T2  - Regionalna bezbednost : pristupi, elementi, dinamika
T1  - Stanje i dometi teorije regionalnog bezbednosnog kompleksa u proučavanju regiona u međunarodnim odnosima
T1  - Reviewing the condition and reach of the regional security complex theory in the study of regions in international relations
DO  - 10.18485/iipe_regbezb.2021.ch1
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Cvetić, Andrej and Kovačević, Marko",
year = "2021",
abstract = "U ovom radu obrazložićemo stav da je teorija regionalnog
bezbednosnog kompleksa (TRBK) (Buzan and Waever 2003), najadekvatnije
pozicionirana među različitim „regionalističkim“ pristupima u
međunarodnim odnosima, bilo u pogledu izgradnje teorije bilo u
empirijskim istraživanjima o regionalnoj bezbednosti. Ciljevi ovog rada su
trostruki: a) da predstavi TRBK u savremenom proučavanju regionalne
bezbednosti; b) da mapira studije regionalne bezbednosti i sagleda odnos
TRBK sa drugim (srodnim/rivalskim) teorijama; c) da oceni karakter
sagledanog odnosa TRBK i drugih teorija regionalne bezbednosti. Tako
postavljenim ciljevima odgovaraju tri metodološka koraka. Prvo, pregledom
literature želimo ukazati na teorijsku evoluciju i empirijsku primenu TRBK
tokom prethodne dve decenije. Drugo, ponudićemo pregled i klasifikaciju
relevantnih koncepata drugih „regionalističkih“ teorija za koje smatramo da
„rezonuju“ sa okvirom TRBK. Treće, odgovorićemo na pitanje da li je i u
kojoj meri je TRBK kompatibilna sa konceptima užih, rivalskih pristupa.
Smatramo da TRBK može poslužiti kao svojevrstan „interfejs“ širih studija regionalne bezbednosti. Kako bismo ilustrovali predloženi postupak, u
trećem odeljku rada se raspravlja o prednostima koje TRBK kao teorija
srednjeg obima ima u odnosu na rivalske pristupe koji se usredsređuju na
regionalne poretke (Katzenstein 2005; Frazier and Stewart-Ingersoll 2010),
regionalne bezbednosne zajednice (Adler and Barnett 1998), ili regionalni
„multipleks“ međunarodni poredak (Acharya 2014; Acharya 2018).
Zaključak upućuje na mogućnosti hibridizacije TRBK i srodnih/rivalskih
teorijskih pristupa, što otvara značajna pitanja za dalji razvoj istraživačkog
programa studija regionalne bezbednosti u trećoj deceniji XXI veka., In this paper, we argue that the Regional Security Complex
Theory (RSCT) (Buzan and Waever 2003) is most adequately positioned
among various “regionalist” approaches in International Relations, both
for theory-building and empirical research on regional security. The aims
of the paper are threefold: a) to review the RSCT within contemporary
International Security Studies; b) to map out regional security studies and
reflect on the relationship between the RSCT and other (related/rival)
theories; c) to assess the character of the relationship between the RSCT
and other theories. The aforesaid aims are achieved in three steps. First,
by doing a literature review, we want to point out the theoretical
evolution and empirical application of the RSCT over the past two
decades. Second, we offer a review and classification of relevant concepts
from other “regionalist” theories which we consider to “resonate” with
the RSCT framework. Third, we answer the question of whether and to
what degree the RSCT is compatible with the concepts of the narrower,
rival approaches. We argue the RSCT can be used as a sort of “interface”
of wider regional security studies. In order to illustrate our research
framework, the third part of the paper deals with and discusses the
advantages that the RSCT, as a medium-range theory, has in comparison
with the rival approaches that are concerned with regional orders
(Katzenstein 2005; Frazier and Stewart-Ingersoll 2010), regional security
communities (Adler and Barnett 1998), or regional “multiplex” order
(Acharya 2014; Acharya 2018). In conclusion, the paper addresses the
possibilities for hybridization between the RSCT and related/rival
approaches, which have opened some important questions for further
development of the research programme of regional security studies in
the 2020s",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu",
journal = "Regionalna bezbednost : pristupi, elementi, dinamika",
booktitle = "Stanje i dometi teorije regionalnog bezbednosnog kompleksa u proučavanju regiona u međunarodnim odnosima, Reviewing the condition and reach of the regional security complex theory in the study of regions in international relations",
doi = "10.18485/iipe_regbezb.2021.ch1"
}

Cvetić, A.,& Kovačević, M.. (2021). Stanje i dometi teorije regionalnog bezbednosnog kompleksa u proučavanju regiona u međunarodnim odnosima. in Regionalna bezbednost : pristupi, elementi, dinamika
Beograd : Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu..
https://doi.org/10.18485/iipe_regbezb.2021.ch1

Cvetić A, Kovačević M. Stanje i dometi teorije regionalnog bezbednosnog kompleksa u proučavanju regiona u međunarodnim odnosima. in Regionalna bezbednost : pristupi, elementi, dinamika. 2021;.
doi:10.18485/iipe_regbezb.2021.ch1 .

Cvetić, Andrej, Kovačević, Marko, "Stanje i dometi teorije regionalnog bezbednosnog kompleksa u proučavanju regiona u međunarodnim odnosima" in Regionalna bezbednost : pristupi, elementi, dinamika (2021),
https://doi.org/10.18485/iipe_regbezb.2021.ch1 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ejdus, Filip
AU  - Kovačević, Marko
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/835
AB  - In this article, we study how the discipline of International Relations (IR) emerged in post-war socialist Yugoslavia and how it evolved during and after the Cold War with the disintegration of Yugoslavia. In particular, we show that IR emerged in Yugoslavia in the 1950s and throughout the Cold War developed as a Marxist-inspired endeavour in support of self-management socialism at home and non-alignment and active peaceful coexistence abroad. After the collapse of Yugoslavia, its IR community was fragmented along the national lines, disillusioned with Marxism and preoccupied with practical war efforts and state-building, which implied a close interest in statecraft, strategy, geopolitics and realism. Since the early 2000s, IR communities from the region have been reconnecting both with the post-Yugoslav area and keeping up with Western and global IR trends. This has implied greater pluralism and diversity in approaches, focusing on post-conflict reconstruction and regional integration, and a gradual turn towards the liberal, critical and constructivist scholarship.
PB  - Palgrave Macmillan
T2  - Journal of International Relations and Development
T1  - International relations (IR) in Yugoslavia and post-Yugoslav states
DO  - 10.1057/s41268-021-00236-w
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ejdus, Filip and Kovačević, Marko",
year = "2021",
abstract = "In this article, we study how the discipline of International Relations (IR) emerged in post-war socialist Yugoslavia and how it evolved during and after the Cold War with the disintegration of Yugoslavia. In particular, we show that IR emerged in Yugoslavia in the 1950s and throughout the Cold War developed as a Marxist-inspired endeavour in support of self-management socialism at home and non-alignment and active peaceful coexistence abroad. After the collapse of Yugoslavia, its IR community was fragmented along the national lines, disillusioned with Marxism and preoccupied with practical war efforts and state-building, which implied a close interest in statecraft, strategy, geopolitics and realism. Since the early 2000s, IR communities from the region have been reconnecting both with the post-Yugoslav area and keeping up with Western and global IR trends. This has implied greater pluralism and diversity in approaches, focusing on post-conflict reconstruction and regional integration, and a gradual turn towards the liberal, critical and constructivist scholarship.",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
journal = "Journal of International Relations and Development",
title = "International relations (IR) in Yugoslavia and post-Yugoslav states",
doi = "10.1057/s41268-021-00236-w"
}

Ejdus, F.,& Kovačević, M.. (2021). International relations (IR) in Yugoslavia and post-Yugoslav states. in Journal of International Relations and Development
Palgrave Macmillan..
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00236-w

Ejdus F, Kovačević M. International relations (IR) in Yugoslavia and post-Yugoslav states. in Journal of International Relations and Development. 2021;.
doi:10.1057/s41268-021-00236-w .

Ejdus, Filip, Kovačević, Marko, "International relations (IR) in Yugoslavia and post-Yugoslav states" in Journal of International Relations and Development (2021),
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00236-w . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kovačević, Marko
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/761
AB  - Understanding the contemporary identity-role construction of small states in South-East Europe is closely linked to the process of reshaping the relative geometry of regional influence of the EU-centre and its powerful marginal actors. This has become increasingly obvious since 2008 with the unraveling of the global economic crisis, Russia's revived influence in the region, and the crisis of EU enlargement - processes that are usually perceived as challenges to the prevalent European conception of order. This paper seeks to explore the interaction of more powerful actors from both the European center' and its 'margins' with the small states on the South-East margin, by developing the framework that builds on Noel Parker's theory of 'positive marginality' and the updated 'constellation theory' by Hans Mouritzen and Anders Wivel. Theoretically, I propose the concepts of 'marginality constellation', 'thin' and 'thick' margins, to understand how small states frame their understanding of agency in world politics more broadly. Empirically, the paper delves into Croatia's and Serbia's foreign policies from 2014 on, to illustrate how the two countries manage their foreign policy identity narratives to respond to the shifting geopolitical centre-margin discourses of the EU and Russia in light of the crisis in Ukraine.
PB  - Routledge Taylor & Francis Group
T2  - Journal of Contemporary European Studies
T1  - Understanding the marginality constellations of small states: Serbia, Croatia, and the crisis of EU-Russia relations
EP  - 423
IS  - 4
SP  - 409
VL  - 27
DO  - 10.1080/14782804.2019.1580564
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kovačević, Marko",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Understanding the contemporary identity-role construction of small states in South-East Europe is closely linked to the process of reshaping the relative geometry of regional influence of the EU-centre and its powerful marginal actors. This has become increasingly obvious since 2008 with the unraveling of the global economic crisis, Russia's revived influence in the region, and the crisis of EU enlargement - processes that are usually perceived as challenges to the prevalent European conception of order. This paper seeks to explore the interaction of more powerful actors from both the European center' and its 'margins' with the small states on the South-East margin, by developing the framework that builds on Noel Parker's theory of 'positive marginality' and the updated 'constellation theory' by Hans Mouritzen and Anders Wivel. Theoretically, I propose the concepts of 'marginality constellation', 'thin' and 'thick' margins, to understand how small states frame their understanding of agency in world politics more broadly. Empirically, the paper delves into Croatia's and Serbia's foreign policies from 2014 on, to illustrate how the two countries manage their foreign policy identity narratives to respond to the shifting geopolitical centre-margin discourses of the EU and Russia in light of the crisis in Ukraine.",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary European Studies",
title = "Understanding the marginality constellations of small states: Serbia, Croatia, and the crisis of EU-Russia relations",
pages = "423-409",
number = "4",
volume = "27",
doi = "10.1080/14782804.2019.1580564"
}

Kovačević, M.. (2019). Understanding the marginality constellations of small states: Serbia, Croatia, and the crisis of EU-Russia relations. in Journal of Contemporary European Studies
Routledge Taylor & Francis Group., 27(4), 409-423.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2019.1580564

Kovačević M. Understanding the marginality constellations of small states: Serbia, Croatia, and the crisis of EU-Russia relations. in Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2019;27(4):409-423.
doi:10.1080/14782804.2019.1580564 .

Kovačević, Marko, "Understanding the marginality constellations of small states: Serbia, Croatia, and the crisis of EU-Russia relations" in Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 27, no. 4 (2019):409-423,
https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2019.1580564 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ejdus, Filip
AU  - Kovačević, Marko
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/754
AB  - According to the Regional Complex Security Theory (RSCT) external involvement in regional security can take either the form of penetration or overlay. We theorise governmentality as the third form of external involvement aimed to responsibilise regions in order to govern them indirectly and at a distance. We illustrate our argument in a study of NATO's role in the Western Balkans since the dissolution of Yugoslavia. In particular, we posit that the predominant role of NATO in the region has evolved over time from penetration in the 1990s, through overlay in the early 2000s, to today's governmentality.
PB  - Routledge Taylor & Francis Group
T2  - Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding
T1  - Penetration, Overlay, Governmentality: The Evolving Role of NATO in the Western Balkan Security Dynamics
EP  - 580
IS  - 5
SP  - 566
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.1080/17502977.2019.1660032
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ejdus, Filip and Kovačević, Marko",
year = "2019",
abstract = "According to the Regional Complex Security Theory (RSCT) external involvement in regional security can take either the form of penetration or overlay. We theorise governmentality as the third form of external involvement aimed to responsibilise regions in order to govern them indirectly and at a distance. We illustrate our argument in a study of NATO's role in the Western Balkans since the dissolution of Yugoslavia. In particular, we posit that the predominant role of NATO in the region has evolved over time from penetration in the 1990s, through overlay in the early 2000s, to today's governmentality.",
publisher = "Routledge Taylor & Francis Group",
journal = "Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding",
title = "Penetration, Overlay, Governmentality: The Evolving Role of NATO in the Western Balkan Security Dynamics",
pages = "580-566",
number = "5",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.1080/17502977.2019.1660032"
}

Ejdus, F.,& Kovačević, M.. (2019). Penetration, Overlay, Governmentality: The Evolving Role of NATO in the Western Balkan Security Dynamics. in Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding
Routledge Taylor & Francis Group., 13(5), 566-580.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2019.1660032

Ejdus F, Kovačević M. Penetration, Overlay, Governmentality: The Evolving Role of NATO in the Western Balkan Security Dynamics. in Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. 2019;13(5):566-580.
doi:10.1080/17502977.2019.1660032 .

Ejdus, Filip, Kovačević, Marko, "Penetration, Overlay, Governmentality: The Evolving Role of NATO in the Western Balkan Security Dynamics" in Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 13, no. 5 (2019):566-580,
https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2019.1660032 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kovačević, Marko
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1248
AB  - Rad razmatra ključne rasprave u savremenim međunarodnim odnosima i
kritički predstavlja i ocenjuje uvide teoretičara u njihovu sadržinu, sistematizujući ih u
analitičkom okviru zasnovanom na Ventovom ontološkom zaokretu, inspirisanom
Rozenauovom rekonceptualizacijom promene u svetskoj politici nakon završetka
Hladnog rata. Svest o složenosti ovakvog zadatka je prisutna, no pomenuti okvir bi, ako
ništa drugo, trebalo da ponudi čitaocu svojevrsnu mapu koja olakšava snalaženje u
naizgled nepreglednom i zamršenom svetu teorije međunarodnih odnosa, njenih trajnih
sporenja i novih istraživačkih tema. Autor je posebnu pažnju posvetio karakterizaciji
discipline u stanju „teorijskog mira”, odnosno značenjima i implikacijama danas
preovlađujućeg teorijskog pluralizma i eklekticizma u međunarodnim odnosima. Autor
ostavlja zaključak otvorenim budući da nije moguće pouzdano predvideti na koji način
će naučna zajednica odgovoriti na ove perspektive, bilo da se krene putem prodornijeg
dijaloga u ranom dobu teorijskog pluralizma, ili da se više radi na „kritičkom rešavanju
problema” koje svakodnevno ispostavlja turbulentna svetska politika.
AB  - This paper takes on the key discussions in the contemporary International Relations and critically presents and evaluates the insights of the theorists in the content of the latter while systematizing them in an analytical framework based on Wendt’s ontological turn and inspired by Roseanu’s reconceptualization of change in the world politics post‐Cold War. Being aware of the complexity of such a task, the framework shall, if anything, offer a reader a map that facilitates our navigation in a seemingly vast and tangled up world of IR theory, its enduring contentions and new research themes. A special attention is paid to a characterization of the discipline in the state of “theoretical peace”, with respect to the meanings and implications of today’s prevalent theoretical pluralism and ecclecticism in IR. It remains to be seen in what ways the IR community will answer to these perspectives, whether it chooses to go for a bolder dialogue in an early phase of theoretical pluralism, or it will work more on “critical problem solving” of the issues that are delivered daily by turbulent world politics.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu
T2  - Međunarodni problemi
T1  - Međunarodni odnosi u doba teorijskog pluralizma: o stanju discipline i glavnim raspravama početkom 21. veka
T1  - International relations in the time of theoretical pluralism: On the state of the discipline and its main debates at the beginning of the 21st century
EP  - 205
IS  - 2-3
SP  - 181
VL  - 69
DO  - 10.2298/MEDJP1703181K
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kovačević, Marko",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Rad razmatra ključne rasprave u savremenim međunarodnim odnosima i
kritički predstavlja i ocenjuje uvide teoretičara u njihovu sadržinu, sistematizujući ih u
analitičkom okviru zasnovanom na Ventovom ontološkom zaokretu, inspirisanom
Rozenauovom rekonceptualizacijom promene u svetskoj politici nakon završetka
Hladnog rata. Svest o složenosti ovakvog zadatka je prisutna, no pomenuti okvir bi, ako
ništa drugo, trebalo da ponudi čitaocu svojevrsnu mapu koja olakšava snalaženje u
naizgled nepreglednom i zamršenom svetu teorije međunarodnih odnosa, njenih trajnih
sporenja i novih istraživačkih tema. Autor je posebnu pažnju posvetio karakterizaciji
discipline u stanju „teorijskog mira”, odnosno značenjima i implikacijama danas
preovlađujućeg teorijskog pluralizma i eklekticizma u međunarodnim odnosima. Autor
ostavlja zaključak otvorenim budući da nije moguće pouzdano predvideti na koji način
će naučna zajednica odgovoriti na ove perspektive, bilo da se krene putem prodornijeg
dijaloga u ranom dobu teorijskog pluralizma, ili da se više radi na „kritičkom rešavanju
problema” koje svakodnevno ispostavlja turbulentna svetska politika., This paper takes on the key discussions in the contemporary International Relations and critically presents and evaluates the insights of the theorists in the content of the latter while systematizing them in an analytical framework based on Wendt’s ontological turn and inspired by Roseanu’s reconceptualization of change in the world politics post‐Cold War. Being aware of the complexity of such a task, the framework shall, if anything, offer a reader a map that facilitates our navigation in a seemingly vast and tangled up world of IR theory, its enduring contentions and new research themes. A special attention is paid to a characterization of the discipline in the state of “theoretical peace”, with respect to the meanings and implications of today’s prevalent theoretical pluralism and ecclecticism in IR. It remains to be seen in what ways the IR community will answer to these perspectives, whether it chooses to go for a bolder dialogue in an early phase of theoretical pluralism, or it will work more on “critical problem solving” of the issues that are delivered daily by turbulent world politics.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu",
journal = "Međunarodni problemi",
title = "Međunarodni odnosi u doba teorijskog pluralizma: o stanju discipline i glavnim raspravama početkom 21. veka, International relations in the time of theoretical pluralism: On the state of the discipline and its main debates at the beginning of the 21st century",
pages = "205-181",
number = "2-3",
volume = "69",
doi = "10.2298/MEDJP1703181K"
}

Kovačević, M.. (2017). Međunarodni odnosi u doba teorijskog pluralizma: o stanju discipline i glavnim raspravama početkom 21. veka. in Međunarodni problemi
Beograd : Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu., 69(2-3), 181-205.
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1703181K

Kovačević M. Međunarodni odnosi u doba teorijskog pluralizma: o stanju discipline i glavnim raspravama početkom 21. veka. in Međunarodni problemi. 2017;69(2-3):181-205.
doi:10.2298/MEDJP1703181K .

Kovačević, Marko, "Međunarodni odnosi u doba teorijskog pluralizma: o stanju discipline i glavnim raspravama početkom 21. veka" in Međunarodni problemi, 69, no. 2-3 (2017):181-205,
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1703181K . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kovačević, Marko
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/627
AB  - This paper takes on the key discussions in the contemporary International Relations and critically presents and evaluates the insights of the theorists in the content of the latter while systematizing them in an analytical framework based on Wendt's ontological turn and inspired by Roseanu's reconceptualization of change in the world politics post‐Cold War. Being aware of the complexity of such a task, the framework shall, if anything, offer a reader a map that facilitates our navigation in a seemingly vast and tangled up world of IR theory, its enduring contentions and new research themes. A special attention is paid to a characterization of the discipline in the state of 'theoretical peace', with respect to the meanings and implications of today's prevalent theoretical pluralism and ecclecticism in IR. It remains to be seen in what ways the IR community will answer to these perspectives, whether it chooses to go for a bolder dialogue in an early phase of theoretical pluralism, or it will work more on 'critical problem solving' of the issues that are delivered daily by turbulent world politics.
AB  - Rad razmatra ključne rasprave u savremenim međunarodnim odnosima i kritički predstavlja i ocenjuje uvide teoretičara u njihovu sadržinu, sistematizujući ih u analitičkom okviru zasnovanom na Ventovom ontološkom zaokretu, inspirisanom Rozenauovom rekonceptualizacijom promene u svetskoj politici nakon završetka Hladnog rata. Svest o složenosti ovakvog zadatka je prisutna, no pomenuti okvir bi, ako ništa drugo, trebalo da ponudi čitaocu svojevrsnu mapu koja olakšava snalaženje u naizgled nepreglednom i zamršenom svetu teorije međunarodnih odnosa, njenih trajnih sporenja i novih istraživačkih tema. Autor je posebnu pažnju posvetio karakterizaciji discipline u stanju 'teorijskog mira', odnosno značenjima i implikacijama danas preovlađujućeg teorijskog pluralizma i eklekticizma u međunarodnim odnosima. Autor ostavlja zaključak otvorenim budući da nije moguće pouzdano predvideti na koji način će naučna zajednica odgovoriti na ove perspektive, bilo da se krene putem prodornijeg dijaloga u ranom dobu teorijskog pluralizma, ili da se više radi na 'kritičkom rešavanju problema' koje svakodnevno ispostavlja turbulentna svetska politika.
PB  - Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd
T2  - Međunarodni problemi
T1  - International Relations in the time of theoretical pluralism: On the state of the discipline and its main debates at the beginning of the 21st century
T1  - Međunarodni odnosi u doba teorijskog pluralizma - o stanju discipline i glavnim raspravama početkom 21. veka
EP  - 205
IS  - 2-3
SP  - 181
VL  - 69
DO  - 10.2298/MEDJP1703181K
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kovačević, Marko",
year = "2017",
abstract = "This paper takes on the key discussions in the contemporary International Relations and critically presents and evaluates the insights of the theorists in the content of the latter while systematizing them in an analytical framework based on Wendt's ontological turn and inspired by Roseanu's reconceptualization of change in the world politics post‐Cold War. Being aware of the complexity of such a task, the framework shall, if anything, offer a reader a map that facilitates our navigation in a seemingly vast and tangled up world of IR theory, its enduring contentions and new research themes. A special attention is paid to a characterization of the discipline in the state of 'theoretical peace', with respect to the meanings and implications of today's prevalent theoretical pluralism and ecclecticism in IR. It remains to be seen in what ways the IR community will answer to these perspectives, whether it chooses to go for a bolder dialogue in an early phase of theoretical pluralism, or it will work more on 'critical problem solving' of the issues that are delivered daily by turbulent world politics., Rad razmatra ključne rasprave u savremenim međunarodnim odnosima i kritički predstavlja i ocenjuje uvide teoretičara u njihovu sadržinu, sistematizujući ih u analitičkom okviru zasnovanom na Ventovom ontološkom zaokretu, inspirisanom Rozenauovom rekonceptualizacijom promene u svetskoj politici nakon završetka Hladnog rata. Svest o složenosti ovakvog zadatka je prisutna, no pomenuti okvir bi, ako ništa drugo, trebalo da ponudi čitaocu svojevrsnu mapu koja olakšava snalaženje u naizgled nepreglednom i zamršenom svetu teorije međunarodnih odnosa, njenih trajnih sporenja i novih istraživačkih tema. Autor je posebnu pažnju posvetio karakterizaciji discipline u stanju 'teorijskog mira', odnosno značenjima i implikacijama danas preovlađujućeg teorijskog pluralizma i eklekticizma u međunarodnim odnosima. Autor ostavlja zaključak otvorenim budući da nije moguće pouzdano predvideti na koji način će naučna zajednica odgovoriti na ove perspektive, bilo da se krene putem prodornijeg dijaloga u ranom dobu teorijskog pluralizma, ili da se više radi na 'kritičkom rešavanju problema' koje svakodnevno ispostavlja turbulentna svetska politika.",
publisher = "Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd",
journal = "Međunarodni problemi",
title = "International Relations in the time of theoretical pluralism: On the state of the discipline and its main debates at the beginning of the 21st century, Međunarodni odnosi u doba teorijskog pluralizma - o stanju discipline i glavnim raspravama početkom 21. veka",
pages = "205-181",
number = "2-3",
volume = "69",
doi = "10.2298/MEDJP1703181K"
}

Kovačević, M.. (2017). International Relations in the time of theoretical pluralism: On the state of the discipline and its main debates at the beginning of the 21st century. in Međunarodni problemi
Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, Beograd., 69(2-3), 181-205.
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1703181K

Kovačević M. International Relations in the time of theoretical pluralism: On the state of the discipline and its main debates at the beginning of the 21st century. in Međunarodni problemi. 2017;69(2-3):181-205.
doi:10.2298/MEDJP1703181K .

Kovačević, Marko, "International Relations in the time of theoretical pluralism: On the state of the discipline and its main debates at the beginning of the 21st century" in Međunarodni problemi, 69, no. 2-3 (2017):181-205,
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1703181K . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kovačević, Marko
PY  - 2016-10-04
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1250
AB  - This paper explores different and changing receptions and uses of ‘East’ and ‘West’ in the foreign policy discourses of Serbia and Croatia, as puzzling cases of state identity configuration. The author suggests and gives meaning to the conception of ‘small state reality’ and offers a perspective on the role of historical, contextual and situational elements of state identity in the understanding of foreign policy orientations and agency. The paper discusses the productive possibilities of such a reading in the light of the relational turn in small states’ literature and recent discussions about ‘non-Western’ international relations.
PB  - Taylor & Francis Online
T2  - Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal
T1  - What place for East and West? Discourses, reality and foreign and security policies of post-Yugoslav small states
EP  - 131
IS  - 1
SP  - 110
VL  - 1
DO  - 10.1080/23802014.2016.1229133
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kovačević, Marko",
year = "2016-10-04",
abstract = "This paper explores different and changing receptions and uses of ‘East’ and ‘West’ in the foreign policy discourses of Serbia and Croatia, as puzzling cases of state identity configuration. The author suggests and gives meaning to the conception of ‘small state reality’ and offers a perspective on the role of historical, contextual and situational elements of state identity in the understanding of foreign policy orientations and agency. The paper discusses the productive possibilities of such a reading in the light of the relational turn in small states’ literature and recent discussions about ‘non-Western’ international relations.",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
journal = "Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal",
title = "What place for East and West? Discourses, reality and foreign and security policies of post-Yugoslav small states",
pages = "131-110",
number = "1",
volume = "1",
doi = "10.1080/23802014.2016.1229133"
}

Kovačević, M.. (2016-10-04). What place for East and West? Discourses, reality and foreign and security policies of post-Yugoslav small states. in Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal
Taylor & Francis Online., 1(1), 110-131.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2016.1229133

Kovačević M. What place for East and West? Discourses, reality and foreign and security policies of post-Yugoslav small states. in Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal. 2016;1(1):110-131.
doi:10.1080/23802014.2016.1229133 .

Kovačević, Marko, "What place for East and West? Discourses, reality and foreign and security policies of post-Yugoslav small states" in Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 1, no. 1 (2016-10-04):110-131,
https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2016.1229133 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kovačević, Marko
AU  - Vujinović, Nikola
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/441
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd
T2  - Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka
T1  - Socijalni konstruktivizam i međunarodni odnosi - Aleksandar Vent: Društvena teorija međunarodne politike, Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd, 2014
EP  - 150
IS  - 11
SP  - 147
VL  - 8
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_441
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kovačević, Marko and Vujinović, Nikola",
year = "2014",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd",
journal = "Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka",
title = "Socijalni konstruktivizam i međunarodni odnosi - Aleksandar Vent: Društvena teorija međunarodne politike, Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd, 2014",
pages = "150-147",
number = "11",
volume = "8",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_441"
}

Kovačević, M.,& Vujinović, N.. (2014). Socijalni konstruktivizam i međunarodni odnosi - Aleksandar Vent: Društvena teorija međunarodne politike, Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd, 2014. in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd., 8(11), 147-150.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_441

Kovačević M, Vujinović N. Socijalni konstruktivizam i međunarodni odnosi - Aleksandar Vent: Društvena teorija međunarodne politike, Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd, 2014. in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka. 2014;8(11):147-150.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_441 .

Kovačević, Marko, Vujinović, Nikola, "Socijalni konstruktivizam i međunarodni odnosi - Aleksandar Vent: Društvena teorija međunarodne politike, Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd, 2014" in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 8, no. 11 (2014):147-150,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_441 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kovačević, Marko
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/410
PB  - Beogradski centar za bezbednosnu politiku, Beograd i Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd
T2  - Journal of Regional Security
T1  - Regional security in a changing world: Kupchan, Charles: No One's World: The West, the Rising Rest and the Coming Global Turn, Oxford University Press, New York, 2012 and Mahbubani, Kishore: The Great Convergence: Asia, the West and the Logic of One World, Public Affairs, New York, 2013
EP  - 181
IS  - 2
SP  - 175
VL  - 8
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_410
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kovačević, Marko",
year = "2013",
publisher = "Beogradski centar za bezbednosnu politiku, Beograd i Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd",
journal = "Journal of Regional Security",
title = "Regional security in a changing world: Kupchan, Charles: No One's World: The West, the Rising Rest and the Coming Global Turn, Oxford University Press, New York, 2012 and Mahbubani, Kishore: The Great Convergence: Asia, the West and the Logic of One World, Public Affairs, New York, 2013",
pages = "181-175",
number = "2",
volume = "8",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_410"
}

Kovačević, M.. (2013). Regional security in a changing world: Kupchan, Charles: No One's World: The West, the Rising Rest and the Coming Global Turn, Oxford University Press, New York, 2012 and Mahbubani, Kishore: The Great Convergence: Asia, the West and the Logic of One World, Public Affairs, New York, 2013. in Journal of Regional Security
Beogradski centar za bezbednosnu politiku, Beograd i Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd., 8(2), 175-181.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_410

Kovačević M. Regional security in a changing world: Kupchan, Charles: No One's World: The West, the Rising Rest and the Coming Global Turn, Oxford University Press, New York, 2012 and Mahbubani, Kishore: The Great Convergence: Asia, the West and the Logic of One World, Public Affairs, New York, 2013. in Journal of Regional Security. 2013;8(2):175-181.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_410 .

Kovačević, Marko, "Regional security in a changing world: Kupchan, Charles: No One's World: The West, the Rising Rest and the Coming Global Turn, Oxford University Press, New York, 2012 and Mahbubani, Kishore: The Great Convergence: Asia, the West and the Logic of One World, Public Affairs, New York, 2013" in Journal of Regional Security, 8, no. 2 (2013):175-181,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_410 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kovačević, Marko
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/371
AB  - By applying the realist, liberal and constructivist approaches to International Relations, in the light of the position the European Union holds in world politics, we are going to answer the question whether the aforementioned theoretical approaches see (do not see) a global actorness for the European Union. Each of the approaches answers the question of the EU’s own manifestation of its actor capacity-by means of using the concepts of the hard, the soft, and the normative power in the analysis. This shall be a way to investigating the degree of EU’s (global) actorness, as well as to testing its actorness through the actual implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy via the three aforementioned concepts of power.
AB  - Primenjujući realističke, liberalističke i konstruktivističke pristupe međunarodnim odnosima, a u svetlu položaja koji Evropska unija zauzima u svetskoj politici, pokušaćemo da odgovorimo na pitanje da li ti pristupi vide (ne vide) globalno akterstvo Evropske unije. Svaki od pristupa daje različit odgovor na pitanje kako Unija ispoljava svoj (akterski) kapacitet - kroz tvrdu, meku ili normativnu moć. Na ovaj način je moguće ispitati stepen razvoja (globalnog) akterstva Evropske unije i testirati njeno akterstvo posredstvom sprovođenja zajedničke spoljne i bezbednosne politike, a uz pomoć tri pomenuta vida moći.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd
T2  - Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka
T1  - Actorness and power of the European Union
T1  - Akterstvo i moć Evropske unije
EP  - 163
IS  - 7
SP  - 145
VL  - 6
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_371
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Kovačević, Marko",
year = "2012",
abstract = "By applying the realist, liberal and constructivist approaches to International Relations, in the light of the position the European Union holds in world politics, we are going to answer the question whether the aforementioned theoretical approaches see (do not see) a global actorness for the European Union. Each of the approaches answers the question of the EU’s own manifestation of its actor capacity-by means of using the concepts of the hard, the soft, and the normative power in the analysis. This shall be a way to investigating the degree of EU’s (global) actorness, as well as to testing its actorness through the actual implementation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy via the three aforementioned concepts of power., Primenjujući realističke, liberalističke i konstruktivističke pristupe međunarodnim odnosima, a u svetlu položaja koji Evropska unija zauzima u svetskoj politici, pokušaćemo da odgovorimo na pitanje da li ti pristupi vide (ne vide) globalno akterstvo Evropske unije. Svaki od pristupa daje različit odgovor na pitanje kako Unija ispoljava svoj (akterski) kapacitet - kroz tvrdu, meku ili normativnu moć. Na ovaj način je moguće ispitati stepen razvoja (globalnog) akterstva Evropske unije i testirati njeno akterstvo posredstvom sprovođenja zajedničke spoljne i bezbednosne politike, a uz pomoć tri pomenuta vida moći.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd",
journal = "Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka",
title = "Actorness and power of the European Union, Akterstvo i moć Evropske unije",
pages = "163-145",
number = "7",
volume = "6",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_371"
}

Kovačević, M.. (2012). Actorness and power of the European Union. in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd., 6(7), 145-163.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_371

Kovačević M. Actorness and power of the European Union. in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka. 2012;6(7):145-163.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_371 .

Kovačević, Marko, "Actorness and power of the European Union" in Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 6, no. 7 (2012):145-163,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_371 .