Domaradzki, Spasimir

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
6f23dc20-5c0c-490d-8306-f1df700a8d4b
  • Domaradzki, Spasimir (2)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

The EU’s raison d’état in the Western Balkans: Can the new enlargement methodology help?

Domaradzki, Spasimir; Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana

(Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu : Beograd, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Domaradzki, Spasimir
AU  - Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/991
AB  - By employing the concept of raison d’état, the article questions the European Union’s role in the so-called Western Balkan region. While the region continues to be covered by the EU’s enlargement policy, we argue that the policy has been in paralysis. We explore whether the heightened geopolitical tensions in Europe have brought the EU to a turning point at which it would use its enlargement policy decisively to pursue its strategic interests in the region. We start with a theoretical discussion of raison d’état and its instrumentalization in the context of the European Union as a non-state actor. Then, we use the conceptual benchmarks of the raison d’état to analyze its empirical implementation through the EU’s relations with Western Balkan countries. We explore the EU’s available enlargement policy tools and the diverging positions within the EU towards enlargement. We pay special attention to the “New enlargement methodology” devised by the Commission in 2019. We argue that despite the Commission’s efforts to promote the EU’s common interest in the region framed in a geopolitical narrative, the diverging national interests still preclude the EU from aggregating its own and pursuing its raison d’état towards the region. The “new methodology” does nothing to overcome this situation. What is more, by insisting on a “stronger political steer” and by further facilitating the reversal of the accession process, the document pushes the Union further away from a common ground regarding the enlargement.
PB  - Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu : Beograd
T2  - Međunarodni problemi
T1  - The EU’s raison d’état in the Western Balkans: Can the new enlargement methodology help?
EP  - 410
IS  - 3
SP  - 391
VL  - LXXIV
DO  - 10.2298/MEDJP2203391R
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Domaradzki, Spasimir and Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana",
year = "2022",
abstract = "By employing the concept of raison d’état, the article questions the European Union’s role in the so-called Western Balkan region. While the region continues to be covered by the EU’s enlargement policy, we argue that the policy has been in paralysis. We explore whether the heightened geopolitical tensions in Europe have brought the EU to a turning point at which it would use its enlargement policy decisively to pursue its strategic interests in the region. We start with a theoretical discussion of raison d’état and its instrumentalization in the context of the European Union as a non-state actor. Then, we use the conceptual benchmarks of the raison d’état to analyze its empirical implementation through the EU’s relations with Western Balkan countries. We explore the EU’s available enlargement policy tools and the diverging positions within the EU towards enlargement. We pay special attention to the “New enlargement methodology” devised by the Commission in 2019. We argue that despite the Commission’s efforts to promote the EU’s common interest in the region framed in a geopolitical narrative, the diverging national interests still preclude the EU from aggregating its own and pursuing its raison d’état towards the region. The “new methodology” does nothing to overcome this situation. What is more, by insisting on a “stronger political steer” and by further facilitating the reversal of the accession process, the document pushes the Union further away from a common ground regarding the enlargement.",
publisher = "Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu : Beograd",
journal = "Međunarodni problemi",
title = "The EU’s raison d’état in the Western Balkans: Can the new enlargement methodology help?",
pages = "410-391",
number = "3",
volume = "LXXIV",
doi = "10.2298/MEDJP2203391R"
}
Domaradzki, S.,& Radić-Milosavljević, I.. (2022). The EU’s raison d’état in the Western Balkans: Can the new enlargement methodology help?. in Međunarodni problemi
Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu : Beograd., LXXIV(3), 391-410.
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP2203391R
Domaradzki S, Radić-Milosavljević I. The EU’s raison d’état in the Western Balkans: Can the new enlargement methodology help?. in Međunarodni problemi. 2022;LXXIV(3):391-410.
doi:10.2298/MEDJP2203391R .
Domaradzki, Spasimir, Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana, "The EU’s raison d’état in the Western Balkans: Can the new enlargement methodology help?" in Međunarodni problemi, LXXIV, no. 3 (2022):391-410,
https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP2203391R . .
2

Between Populism and Technocracy: How National Executives in Bulgaria and Serbia Manipulate EU Rule of Law Conditionality

Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana; Domaradzki, Spasimir

(UACES : London, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana
AU  - Domaradzki, Spasimir
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/974
AB  - This article explores how national executives in Serbia and Bulgaria address European Union (EU) rule of law conditionality by framing it within the populism/technocracy dichotomy. The rule of law remains one of the main problems of EU relations with the two countries. While acknowledging the nuances of pre- and post-enlargement Europeanisation, this article explores the technocratic and populist narratives exploited by the national executives in their interactions with the EU and their domestic public. Rather than positioning the current executives unequivocally either as populist or technocratic, we argue that the political elites act strategically in using both populist and technocratic techniques towards their publics when explaining interaction with the EU. We explore the extent this type of executive behaviour is determined by the countries’ formally different status. While we look for the levels of possible similarity and distinction in the two cases/countries stemming from their different EU membership status, our findings confirm the existence of strategic defensive populist and technocratic techniques applied towards the EU and the national public in both countries The aim of this strategy is to mitigate the impact of the EU rule of law pressure and to secure the persistence of the existing rule of law shortcomings within the process of European integration. Interestingly, our research did not identify substantial impact of the formally different status towards the EU of the two countries.
PB  - UACES : London
T2  - Journal of Contemporary European Research
T1  - Between Populism and Technocracy: How National Executives in Bulgaria and Serbia Manipulate EU Rule of Law Conditionality
EP  - 303
IS  - 2
SP  - 281
VL  - 17
DO  - 10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1181
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana and Domaradzki, Spasimir",
year = "2021",
abstract = "This article explores how national executives in Serbia and Bulgaria address European Union (EU) rule of law conditionality by framing it within the populism/technocracy dichotomy. The rule of law remains one of the main problems of EU relations with the two countries. While acknowledging the nuances of pre- and post-enlargement Europeanisation, this article explores the technocratic and populist narratives exploited by the national executives in their interactions with the EU and their domestic public. Rather than positioning the current executives unequivocally either as populist or technocratic, we argue that the political elites act strategically in using both populist and technocratic techniques towards their publics when explaining interaction with the EU. We explore the extent this type of executive behaviour is determined by the countries’ formally different status. While we look for the levels of possible similarity and distinction in the two cases/countries stemming from their different EU membership status, our findings confirm the existence of strategic defensive populist and technocratic techniques applied towards the EU and the national public in both countries The aim of this strategy is to mitigate the impact of the EU rule of law pressure and to secure the persistence of the existing rule of law shortcomings within the process of European integration. Interestingly, our research did not identify substantial impact of the formally different status towards the EU of the two countries.",
publisher = "UACES : London",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary European Research",
title = "Between Populism and Technocracy: How National Executives in Bulgaria and Serbia Manipulate EU Rule of Law Conditionality",
pages = "303-281",
number = "2",
volume = "17",
doi = "10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1181"
}
Radić-Milosavljević, I.,& Domaradzki, S.. (2021). Between Populism and Technocracy: How National Executives in Bulgaria and Serbia Manipulate EU Rule of Law Conditionality. in Journal of Contemporary European Research
UACES : London., 17(2), 281-303.
https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1181
Radić-Milosavljević I, Domaradzki S. Between Populism and Technocracy: How National Executives in Bulgaria and Serbia Manipulate EU Rule of Law Conditionality. in Journal of Contemporary European Research. 2021;17(2):281-303.
doi:10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1181 .
Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana, Domaradzki, Spasimir, "Between Populism and Technocracy: How National Executives in Bulgaria and Serbia Manipulate EU Rule of Law Conditionality" in Journal of Contemporary European Research, 17, no. 2 (2021):281-303,
https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1181 . .
1
1
3