Nacionalni interesi Republike Srbije: od osporavanja do legitimizacije, Fond za nauku RS, "Ideje"

Link to this page

Nacionalni interesi Republike Srbije: od osporavanja do legitimizacije, Fond za nauku RS, "Ideje"

Authors

Publications

Србија и Европска унија две деценије након Солунског самита

Petrović, Miloš; Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana; Kovačević, Maja

(Београд : Институт за међународну политику и привреду, 2023)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Petrović, Miloš
AU  - Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana
AU  - Kovačević, Maja
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1125
PB  - Београд : Институт за међународну политику и привреду
T1  - Србија и Европска унија две деценије након Солунског самита
EP  - 428
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1125
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Petrović, Miloš and Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana and Kovačević, Maja",
year = "2023",
publisher = "Београд : Институт за међународну политику и привреду",
title = "Србија и Европска унија две деценије након Солунског самита",
pages = "428",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1125"
}
Petrović, M., Radić-Milosavljević, I.,& Kovačević, M.. (2023). Србија и Европска унија две деценије након Солунског самита. 
Београд : Институт за међународну политику и привреду..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1125
Petrović M, Radić-Milosavljević I, Kovačević M. Србија и Европска унија две деценије након Солунског самита. 2023;:null-428.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1125 .
Petrović, Miloš, Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana, Kovačević, Maja, "Србија и Европска унија две деценије након Солунског самита" (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1125 .

Navigating EU enlargement: balancing chronological precedence and geopolitical priorities

Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana; Petrović, Miloš

(Beograd : Udruženje za političke nauke Srbije, 2023)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana
AU  - Petrović, Miloš
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rfpn.fpn.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1111
AB  - By employing a realist approach, the authors investigate how geopolitical factors influence the
EU's decision to expand into regions of strategic importance or vulnerability to major powers’
influence, as a means to enhance its security and projection of power. They also explore the
obstacle posed by the absence of a unanimous stance on "pre-scheduled" accessions, as seen in
the past in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The authors argue that the changed geopolitical
landscape in Europe has profoundly influenced the European Union's (EU) enlargement policy.
However, its impact has been asymmetrical in the two main micro-regions: the Western Balkans
on the one hand and the Eastern neighbourhood on the other. The authors contend that the EU's
response has not predominantly been strategic but rather tactical. This phenomenon reflects the
15
longstanding deficiencies in the EU's enlargement policy, coupled with the urgent need to
extend commitments to the eastern partners who face immediate security threats from Russia.
Nevertheless, the authors hypothesise that such tendencies are not advantageous for the Western
Balkans, which face lower direct jeopardy from Russia. Consequently, it becomes a lower
priority for the European Union, despite its chronological precedence in the enlargement
domain. While ideally, both enlargement regions should be granted an "accession timetable"
along with on-ground democratic reforms (similar to CEE), the authors highlight that due to
differing geopolitical dynamics and pressure, the outcomes for the two regions may either
diverge in terms of potential favouring of the new candidates or, perhaps more likely, converge
– meaning that the accession of either region might be postponed until after the invasion of
Ukraine ends.
PB  - Beograd : Udruženje za političke nauke Srbije
C3  - EU enlargement, geopolitics, and the Russian-Ukraine war: The 2023 Annual International Conference of the Serbian Political Science Association
T1  - Navigating EU enlargement: balancing chronological precedence and geopolitical priorities
EP  - 15
SP  - 14
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1111
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana and Petrović, Miloš",
year = "2023",
abstract = "By employing a realist approach, the authors investigate how geopolitical factors influence the
EU's decision to expand into regions of strategic importance or vulnerability to major powers’
influence, as a means to enhance its security and projection of power. They also explore the
obstacle posed by the absence of a unanimous stance on "pre-scheduled" accessions, as seen in
the past in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The authors argue that the changed geopolitical
landscape in Europe has profoundly influenced the European Union's (EU) enlargement policy.
However, its impact has been asymmetrical in the two main micro-regions: the Western Balkans
on the one hand and the Eastern neighbourhood on the other. The authors contend that the EU's
response has not predominantly been strategic but rather tactical. This phenomenon reflects the
15
longstanding deficiencies in the EU's enlargement policy, coupled with the urgent need to
extend commitments to the eastern partners who face immediate security threats from Russia.
Nevertheless, the authors hypothesise that such tendencies are not advantageous for the Western
Balkans, which face lower direct jeopardy from Russia. Consequently, it becomes a lower
priority for the European Union, despite its chronological precedence in the enlargement
domain. While ideally, both enlargement regions should be granted an "accession timetable"
along with on-ground democratic reforms (similar to CEE), the authors highlight that due to
differing geopolitical dynamics and pressure, the outcomes for the two regions may either
diverge in terms of potential favouring of the new candidates or, perhaps more likely, converge
– meaning that the accession of either region might be postponed until after the invasion of
Ukraine ends.",
publisher = "Beograd : Udruženje za političke nauke Srbije",
journal = "EU enlargement, geopolitics, and the Russian-Ukraine war: The 2023 Annual International Conference of the Serbian Political Science Association",
title = "Navigating EU enlargement: balancing chronological precedence and geopolitical priorities",
pages = "15-14",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1111"
}
Radić-Milosavljević, I.,& Petrović, M.. (2023). Navigating EU enlargement: balancing chronological precedence and geopolitical priorities. in EU enlargement, geopolitics, and the Russian-Ukraine war: The 2023 Annual International Conference of the Serbian Political Science Association
Beograd : Udruženje za političke nauke Srbije., 14-15.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1111
Radić-Milosavljević I, Petrović M. Navigating EU enlargement: balancing chronological precedence and geopolitical priorities. in EU enlargement, geopolitics, and the Russian-Ukraine war: The 2023 Annual International Conference of the Serbian Political Science Association. 2023;:14-15.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1111 .
Radić-Milosavljević, Ivana, Petrović, Miloš, "Navigating EU enlargement: balancing chronological precedence and geopolitical priorities" in EU enlargement, geopolitics, and the Russian-Ukraine war: The 2023 Annual International Conference of the Serbian Political Science Association (2023):14-15,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rfpn_1111 .